We have located links that may give you full text access.
Feasibility of physiotherapist-led rheumatology triage: A randomized study.
Journal of Rheumatology 2024 April 15
OBJECTIVE: Given global shortages in the rheumatology workforce, the demand for rheumatology assessment often exceeds the capacity to provide timely access to care. Accurate triage of patient referrals is important to ensure appropriate utilization of finite resources. We assessed the feasibility of physiotherapist-led triage utilizing a standardized protocol, in identifying cases of inflammatory arthritis (IA), as compared to usual rheumatologist triage of referrals for joint pain, in a tertiary care rheumatology clinic.
METHODS: We performed a single-center, prospective, non-blinded, randomized, parallel-group feasibility study with referrals randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either physiotherapist-led versus usual rheumatologist triage. Standardized information was collected at referral receipt, triage, and clinic visit. Rheumatologist diagnosis was considered the gold-standard for diagnosis of IA.
RESULTS: 102 referrals were randomized to the physiotherapist-led triage arm and 101 to the rheumatologist arm. In the physiotherapist-led arm, 65 percent of referrals triaged as urgent were confirmed to have IA versus 60 percent in the rheumatologist arm (p=0.57) suggesting similar accuracy in identifying IA. More referrals were declined in the physiotherapist-led triage arm 24 versus 8 (p=0.002) resulting in less referrals triaged as semi-urgent 6 versus 23 (p < 0.003). One case of IA (rheumatologist arm) was incorrectly triaged, resulting in significant delay in time to first assessment.
CONCLUSION: Physiotherapist-led triage was feasible, appeared as reliable as rheumatologist triage of referrals for joint pain, and lead to significantly fewer patients requiring in-clinic visits.
METHODS: We performed a single-center, prospective, non-blinded, randomized, parallel-group feasibility study with referrals randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either physiotherapist-led versus usual rheumatologist triage. Standardized information was collected at referral receipt, triage, and clinic visit. Rheumatologist diagnosis was considered the gold-standard for diagnosis of IA.
RESULTS: 102 referrals were randomized to the physiotherapist-led triage arm and 101 to the rheumatologist arm. In the physiotherapist-led arm, 65 percent of referrals triaged as urgent were confirmed to have IA versus 60 percent in the rheumatologist arm (p=0.57) suggesting similar accuracy in identifying IA. More referrals were declined in the physiotherapist-led triage arm 24 versus 8 (p=0.002) resulting in less referrals triaged as semi-urgent 6 versus 23 (p < 0.003). One case of IA (rheumatologist arm) was incorrectly triaged, resulting in significant delay in time to first assessment.
CONCLUSION: Physiotherapist-led triage was feasible, appeared as reliable as rheumatologist triage of referrals for joint pain, and lead to significantly fewer patients requiring in-clinic visits.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2025 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app