We have located links that may give you full text access.
The dimensionality of vaccination intentions: One strain or multiple strains?
Health Psychology : Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association 2024 April 4
OBJECTIVE: People likely have different attitudes toward different vaccines (e.g., they may hold a positive attitude toward the measles, mumps, and rubella-vaccine while simultaneously hold a neutral attitude toward the flu shot). To examine the dimensionality of vaccination intentions, we measured vaccination intentions toward 16 different diseases. We hypothesized that people differentiate between child-directed vaccination intentions and self-directed vaccination intentions. Furthermore, we hypothesized that some commonly studied factors (e.g., trust in authorities and fear of needles) might have different associations with the two subtypes of vaccination intentions.
METHOD: We used data from a nationally representative sample of the Netherlands collected in 2021. We used exploratory ( N = 865) and confirmatory factor analysis ( N = 865) to evaluate the dimensionality hypothesis and used linear hypothesis tests ( N = 1,779) to test whether the commonly studied factors had different associations with the different subtypes of vaccination intentions.
RESULTS: The analysis showed two distinct factors of vaccination intentions: intentions toward childhood diseases and intentions toward nonchildhood diseases. Additionally, spiritual beliefs, trust in authorities, and belief in conspiracy theories had stronger associations with nonchildhood diseases than with childhood diseases. Fear of needles, prosocial personality, and religious orthodox beliefs did not have different associations with both types of vaccination intentions.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that vaccination intentions is a multidimensional construct and that interventions may benefit from being tailored to the factors relevant for each specific type of vaccine. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
METHOD: We used data from a nationally representative sample of the Netherlands collected in 2021. We used exploratory ( N = 865) and confirmatory factor analysis ( N = 865) to evaluate the dimensionality hypothesis and used linear hypothesis tests ( N = 1,779) to test whether the commonly studied factors had different associations with the different subtypes of vaccination intentions.
RESULTS: The analysis showed two distinct factors of vaccination intentions: intentions toward childhood diseases and intentions toward nonchildhood diseases. Additionally, spiritual beliefs, trust in authorities, and belief in conspiracy theories had stronger associations with nonchildhood diseases than with childhood diseases. Fear of needles, prosocial personality, and religious orthodox beliefs did not have different associations with both types of vaccination intentions.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that vaccination intentions is a multidimensional construct and that interventions may benefit from being tailored to the factors relevant for each specific type of vaccine. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Insomnia in older adults: A review of treatment options.Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2025 January 2
How We Treat ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Focus on the Maintenance Therapy.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2025 January 2
Allergic rhinitis.Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology 2024 December 27
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: 2025 Update on the Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapy.American Journal of Hematology 2025 January 28
Sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock: controversies and evidence gaps in diagnosis and management.Journal of Intensive Care 2025 January 2
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2025 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app