We have located links that may give you full text access.
Parametric net influx rate imaging of 68 Ga-DOTATATE in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: assessment of lesion detectability.
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 2024 April 4
OBJECTIVES: There has been developed a clinical dynamic total-body 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging protocol that allows quantitative imaging of net influx rate (Ki ). Using qualitative and quantitative analyses of clinical studies, this retrospective study aims to assess whether parametric Ki images improve lesion detectability.
METHODS: Using a 194-cm axial field-of-view PET/CT scanner, 52 patients with neuroendocrine tumors underwent a 60-min dynamic total-body 68 Ga-DOTATATE scan. Parametric Ki images and static standardized uptake value (SUV) images were generated. In addition to visual inspection of both sets of images, a quantitative analysis of 249 individual lesions was conducted using the target-to-background (TBR) metric.
RESULTS: There were 52 patients who underwent dynamic total-body 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scans. A total of 249 lesions were evaluated, of which 66 lesions were biopsy-proven and 183 lesions were unproven. Ki images produced two fewer false positives than the SUV images. Overall, our results from 66 proven NET lesions suggested similar sensitivity (98.5%) but improved accuracy (from 95.6 to 97.1%) and potentially enhanced specificity with Ki over SUV imaging. Besides, there was no difference in the number of pathological lesions identified visually in both images. However, Ki TBR was significantly higher than SUV TBR quantitatively (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patlak Ki imaging provides nuclear physicians with a PET image with higher tumor contrast which may enhance confidence in diagnosis with possibly reduced false positive results, albeit an equivalent detectability, compared to static SUV image.
METHODS: Using a 194-cm axial field-of-view PET/CT scanner, 52 patients with neuroendocrine tumors underwent a 60-min dynamic total-body 68 Ga-DOTATATE scan. Parametric Ki images and static standardized uptake value (SUV) images were generated. In addition to visual inspection of both sets of images, a quantitative analysis of 249 individual lesions was conducted using the target-to-background (TBR) metric.
RESULTS: There were 52 patients who underwent dynamic total-body 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scans. A total of 249 lesions were evaluated, of which 66 lesions were biopsy-proven and 183 lesions were unproven. Ki images produced two fewer false positives than the SUV images. Overall, our results from 66 proven NET lesions suggested similar sensitivity (98.5%) but improved accuracy (from 95.6 to 97.1%) and potentially enhanced specificity with Ki over SUV imaging. Besides, there was no difference in the number of pathological lesions identified visually in both images. However, Ki TBR was significantly higher than SUV TBR quantitatively (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patlak Ki imaging provides nuclear physicians with a PET image with higher tumor contrast which may enhance confidence in diagnosis with possibly reduced false positive results, albeit an equivalent detectability, compared to static SUV image.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Demystifying normal-anion-gap metabolic acidosis: pathophysiology, aetiology, evaluation and diagnosis.Internal Medicine Journal 2024 July
Nutritional Support in the ICU.BMJ : British Medical Journal 2025 January 2
Elective peri-operative management of adults taking glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: a multidisciplinary consensus statement: A consensus statement from the Association of Anaesthetists, Association of British Clinical Diabetologists, British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society, Centre for Perioperative Care, Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care, Royal College of Anaesthetists, Society for Obesity and Bariatric Anaesthesia and UK Clinical Pharmacy Association.Anaesthesia 2025 January 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2025 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app