We have located links that may give you full text access.
Anatomy of the Lumbrical Muscles: Implications for Mechanical Advantage.
BACKGROUND: The lumbrical muscles comprise 4 intrinsic muscles of the hand and are involved in flexion of the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) and extension of the proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal joints. The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical mechanics of the lumbrical muscles of the index, middle, ring, and small fingers.
METHODS: We evaluated 25 cadaver arms and measured the distance between the MCPJ and fingertip, the distance between the MCPJ and lumbrical muscle insertion, and the distance between the MCPJ and the most proximal lumbrical muscle origin. With these measurements we calculated the needed force, insertion ratio (length of the proximal, middle, and distal phalanx divided by the MCPJ to insertion distance), and lumbrical muscle length.
RESULTS: We found that the force was significantly different between all fingers, except for the comparison of the index and ring finger ( P = .34). In addition, we found that muscle length was significantly different between most the fingers, except for the comparison between the index and middle fingers ( P = .24), and index and ring fingers ( P = .20). There was no significant difference in insertion ratio.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the anatomical mechanics for the motor function of the lumbrical muscles are similar in all fingers. This could further imply that movements are equally precise in all fingers resulting in coordination with one another and, therefore, adequate hand function.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
METHODS: We evaluated 25 cadaver arms and measured the distance between the MCPJ and fingertip, the distance between the MCPJ and lumbrical muscle insertion, and the distance between the MCPJ and the most proximal lumbrical muscle origin. With these measurements we calculated the needed force, insertion ratio (length of the proximal, middle, and distal phalanx divided by the MCPJ to insertion distance), and lumbrical muscle length.
RESULTS: We found that the force was significantly different between all fingers, except for the comparison of the index and ring finger ( P = .34). In addition, we found that muscle length was significantly different between most the fingers, except for the comparison between the index and middle fingers ( P = .24), and index and ring fingers ( P = .20). There was no significant difference in insertion ratio.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the anatomical mechanics for the motor function of the lumbrical muscles are similar in all fingers. This could further imply that movements are equally precise in all fingers resulting in coordination with one another and, therefore, adequate hand function.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Drug-Induced Myocardial Infarction: A Review of Pharmacological Triggers and Pathophysiological Mechanisms.Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 2024 December 18
Treatment strategies to reduce cardiovascular risk in persons with chronic kidney disease and Type 2 diabetes.Journal of Internal Medicine 2024 December 31
Guidelines for administering gadolinium-based contrast agents to patients with renal dysfunction (Version 3: Revised May 20th, 2024).Clinical and Experimental Nephrology 2025 January 3
The PRECISE trial: How should patients with chest pain be tested?Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2024 November 1
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2025 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app