We have located links that may give you full text access.
Optimal cut-off value for identifying objective response in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after induction chemotherapy.
Head & Neck 2024 March 28
BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish the most suitable threshold for objective response (OR) in the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
METHODS: According to RECIST 1.1, we retrospectively evaluated MR images of NPC lesions in patients before and after induction chemotherapy (IC). Restricted cubic spline and maximally selected rank statistics were used to determine the cut-off value. Survival rates and differences between groups were compared with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests.
RESULTS: Of 1126 patients, 365 cases who received IC treatment were suitable for RECIST 1.1 evaluation. The 20% cut-off value maximized between-group differences according to maximally selected rank statistics. No difference in distant metastasis-free survival between OR and non-response groups was shown using the primary threshold of OR (30%), while it differed when 20% was employed.
CONCLUSIONS: With an optimal cut-off value of 20%, RECIST may assist clinicians to accurately evaluate disease response in NPC patients.
METHODS: According to RECIST 1.1, we retrospectively evaluated MR images of NPC lesions in patients before and after induction chemotherapy (IC). Restricted cubic spline and maximally selected rank statistics were used to determine the cut-off value. Survival rates and differences between groups were compared with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests.
RESULTS: Of 1126 patients, 365 cases who received IC treatment were suitable for RECIST 1.1 evaluation. The 20% cut-off value maximized between-group differences according to maximally selected rank statistics. No difference in distant metastasis-free survival between OR and non-response groups was shown using the primary threshold of OR (30%), while it differed when 20% was employed.
CONCLUSIONS: With an optimal cut-off value of 20%, RECIST may assist clinicians to accurately evaluate disease response in NPC patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Septic shock in the immunocompromised cancer patient: a narrative review.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2024 August 30
Proteinuria and Progression of Renal Damage: The Main Pathogenetic Mechanisms and Pharmacological Approach.Medicina 2024 November 6
New strategies for the treatment of hyperkalemia.European Journal of Internal Medicine 2024 November 2
Hemodialysis Vascular Access: Core Curriculum 2025.American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2024 December 2
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app