We have located links that may give you full text access.
Changes in Contraceptive Method Mix Following the Colorado Family Planning Initiative.
Contraception 2024 March 21
OBJECTIVE: To describe the changes in contraceptive method use and mix among Colorado Title X clients following the 2009 Colorado Family Planning Initiative (CFPI), which allowed Colorado Title X providers to offer all contraceptive methods without medically unnecessary barriers.
STUDY DESIGN: Using data on all visits to Colorado Title X clinics between 2007 and 2016 for women aged 10-49 years, we described trends in contraceptive method use by age group and race/ethnicity prior to and following the implementation of CFPI.
RESULTS: The implementation of CFPI saw an abrupt increase in Title X visits. Visits subsequently declined steeply for non-Hispanic White clients while visits by Hispanic clients remained at elevated levels. During CFPI, use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) increased while use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) decreased. Nonetheless, OCPs remained the most common method used by Title X clients throughout the study period. Changes in method mix varied by age and race/ethnicity. Method switching was relatively uncommon among established Title X clinic users.
CONCLUSION: CFPI, which removed financial barriers to the most expensive methods, was associated with increases in the use of LARCs and changes in method mix that varied by age group and race/ethnicity.
IMPLICATIONS: CFPI removed barriers to previously inaccessible methods that contributed to changes in the method mix at Title X clinics. That these changes were not uniform across ages and race/ethnicities emphasizes that subgroup variation in family planning policy impact stems from heterogeneity in barriers to care and method-specific unmet demand.
STUDY DESIGN: Using data on all visits to Colorado Title X clinics between 2007 and 2016 for women aged 10-49 years, we described trends in contraceptive method use by age group and race/ethnicity prior to and following the implementation of CFPI.
RESULTS: The implementation of CFPI saw an abrupt increase in Title X visits. Visits subsequently declined steeply for non-Hispanic White clients while visits by Hispanic clients remained at elevated levels. During CFPI, use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) increased while use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) decreased. Nonetheless, OCPs remained the most common method used by Title X clients throughout the study period. Changes in method mix varied by age and race/ethnicity. Method switching was relatively uncommon among established Title X clinic users.
CONCLUSION: CFPI, which removed financial barriers to the most expensive methods, was associated with increases in the use of LARCs and changes in method mix that varied by age group and race/ethnicity.
IMPLICATIONS: CFPI removed barriers to previously inaccessible methods that contributed to changes in the method mix at Title X clinics. That these changes were not uniform across ages and race/ethnicities emphasizes that subgroup variation in family planning policy impact stems from heterogeneity in barriers to care and method-specific unmet demand.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Demystifying normal-anion-gap metabolic acidosis: pathophysiology, aetiology, evaluation and diagnosis.Internal Medicine Journal 2024 July
Point-of-care ultrasound in Gastroenterology and Hepatology.Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2025 January 8
Nutritional Support in the ICU.BMJ : British Medical Journal 2025 January 2
Elective peri-operative management of adults taking glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: a multidisciplinary consensus statement: A consensus statement from the Association of Anaesthetists, Association of British Clinical Diabetologists, British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society, Centre for Perioperative Care, Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care, Royal College of Anaesthetists, Society for Obesity and Bariatric Anaesthesia and UK Clinical Pharmacy Association.Anaesthesia 2025 January 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2025 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app