We have located links that may give you full text access.
Histological evaluation of edentulous alveolar ridge horizontal bone augmentations using a xenogeneic bone substitute and autologous platelet concentrates: a case series.
Quintessence International 2024 March 19
OBJECTIVES: This case series aimed to assess the efficacy of a novel horizontal ridge augmentation modality using histology. Combinations of "sticky bone" and tenting screws without autologous bone were used as augmentative materials.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five individuals presenting healed, atrophic, partially edentulous sites that required horizontal bone augmentation before implant placement were enrolled. Patients underwent the same augmentation type and five months of postoperative reentry procedures. The first surgery served as implant site development, while the biopsy and corresponding implant placement were performed during reentry. The bone was qualitatively analyzed using histology and histomorphometry and quantitatively evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
RESULTS: Four individuals healed uneventfully. Early wound dehiscence occurred in one case. Histology showed favorable bone substitute incorporation into the newly formed bone and intimate contact between de novo bone and graft material in most cases. Histomorphometry revealed an average of 48 + 28% newly formed bone, 19 + 13% graft material, and 33 + 26% soft tissue components. The CBCT-based mean alveolar ridge horizontal increase was 3.9 + 0.6 mm at five months postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: The described augmentation method appears suitable for implant site development resulting in favorable bone quality according to histology. However, clinicians must accommodate 1-2 mm resorption in augmentative material width at the buccal aspect.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five individuals presenting healed, atrophic, partially edentulous sites that required horizontal bone augmentation before implant placement were enrolled. Patients underwent the same augmentation type and five months of postoperative reentry procedures. The first surgery served as implant site development, while the biopsy and corresponding implant placement were performed during reentry. The bone was qualitatively analyzed using histology and histomorphometry and quantitatively evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
RESULTS: Four individuals healed uneventfully. Early wound dehiscence occurred in one case. Histology showed favorable bone substitute incorporation into the newly formed bone and intimate contact between de novo bone and graft material in most cases. Histomorphometry revealed an average of 48 + 28% newly formed bone, 19 + 13% graft material, and 33 + 26% soft tissue components. The CBCT-based mean alveolar ridge horizontal increase was 3.9 + 0.6 mm at five months postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: The described augmentation method appears suitable for implant site development resulting in favorable bone quality according to histology. However, clinicians must accommodate 1-2 mm resorption in augmentative material width at the buccal aspect.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app