We have located links that may give you full text access.
Abnormal exertional breathlessness on cardiopulmonary cycle exercise testing in relation to self-reported and physiological responses in chronic airflow limitation.
Chest 2024 Februrary 27
BACKGROUND: Exertional breathlessness is a cardinal symptom of cardiorespiratory disease.
RESEARCH QUESTION: How does breathlessness abnormality graded using normative reference equations during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) relate to self-reported and physiological responses in people with chronic airflow limitation (CAL).
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Analysis of people aged ≥40 years with CAL undergoing CPET in the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease study. Breathlessness intensity ratings (Borg 0-10 category ratio scale [CR10]) were evaluated in relation to power output (W), rate of oxygen uptake (V'O2 ), and minute ventilation (V'E ) at peak exercise using normative reference equations as: 1) probability of breathlessness normality (probability of having an equal or greater Borg CR10 rating among healthy; lower probability reflecting more severe breathlessness); and 2) presence of abnormal breathlessness (rating above the upper limit of normal [ULN]). Associations with relevant participant-reported and physiologic outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: We included 330 participants (44% women): mean±SD age 64±10 years (range 40-89), FEV1 /FVC 57.3±8.2%, FEV1 75.6±17.9%predicted. Abnormally low exercise capacity (peak V'O2 <lower limit of normal) was present in 26%. Relative to peak W, V'O2 and V'E , abnormally high breathlessness was present in 26%, 25% and 18% of participants. For all equations, abnormally high exertional breathlessness was associated with worse lung function, exercise capacity, self-reported symptom burden, physical activity, health-related quality of life; and greater physiological abnormalities during CPET.
INTERPRETATION: Abnormal breathlessness graded using CPET normative reference equations was associated with worse clinical, physiological, and functional outcomes in people with CAL supporting construct validity of abnormal exertional breathlessness.
RESEARCH QUESTION: How does breathlessness abnormality graded using normative reference equations during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) relate to self-reported and physiological responses in people with chronic airflow limitation (CAL).
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Analysis of people aged ≥40 years with CAL undergoing CPET in the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease study. Breathlessness intensity ratings (Borg 0-10 category ratio scale [CR10]) were evaluated in relation to power output (W), rate of oxygen uptake (V'O2 ), and minute ventilation (V'E ) at peak exercise using normative reference equations as: 1) probability of breathlessness normality (probability of having an equal or greater Borg CR10 rating among healthy; lower probability reflecting more severe breathlessness); and 2) presence of abnormal breathlessness (rating above the upper limit of normal [ULN]). Associations with relevant participant-reported and physiologic outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: We included 330 participants (44% women): mean±SD age 64±10 years (range 40-89), FEV1 /FVC 57.3±8.2%, FEV1 75.6±17.9%predicted. Abnormally low exercise capacity (peak V'O2 <lower limit of normal) was present in 26%. Relative to peak W, V'O2 and V'E , abnormally high breathlessness was present in 26%, 25% and 18% of participants. For all equations, abnormally high exertional breathlessness was associated with worse lung function, exercise capacity, self-reported symptom burden, physical activity, health-related quality of life; and greater physiological abnormalities during CPET.
INTERPRETATION: Abnormal breathlessness graded using CPET normative reference equations was associated with worse clinical, physiological, and functional outcomes in people with CAL supporting construct validity of abnormal exertional breathlessness.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app