We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Identification of Intervention Characteristics within Diabetes Prevention Programs using the TIDieR: a Scoping Review.
Canadian Journal of Diabetes 2024 Februrary 26
AIM: Diabetes prevention programs targeting dietary and physical activity behavior change have been shown to decrease the incidence of type 2 diabetes; however, more thorough reporting of intervention characteristics is needed to expedite the translation of such programs into different communities. This scoping review aims to synthesize how diabetes prevention programs are being reported and implemented.
METHODS: A scoping review following the Arkey and O'Malley methods was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus were searched for studies relating to diabetes prevention, and diet/exercise interventions. Only studies delivering a diet/exercise intervention among adults identified as "at risk" for developing type 2 diabetes were included. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) was used to guide data extraction, and each DPP was scored on a scale from 0 to 2 for how thoroughly it reported each of the items (0 = did not report; 2 = reported in full; total score /26).
RESULTS: Of the 25,110 publications screened, 351 publications (based on 220 programs) met the inclusion criteria and were included for data extraction. No studies comprehensively reported on all TIDieR domains (mean TIDieR score = 15.7/26; range 7 to 25). Reporting was particularly poor among domains related to 'modifications', 'tailoring', and 'how well (planned/actual)'. "How well (planned)" assesses the intended delivery of an intervention, detailing the initial strategies and components as per the original design, while "how well (actual)" evaluates the extent to which the intervention was executed as planned during the study, including any deviations or modifications made in practice.
CONCLUSIONS: While there is evidence to suggest that diabetes prevention programs are efficacious, more thorough reporting of program content and delivery is needed to improve the ability for effective programs to be implemented or translated into different communities.
METHODS: A scoping review following the Arkey and O'Malley methods was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus were searched for studies relating to diabetes prevention, and diet/exercise interventions. Only studies delivering a diet/exercise intervention among adults identified as "at risk" for developing type 2 diabetes were included. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) was used to guide data extraction, and each DPP was scored on a scale from 0 to 2 for how thoroughly it reported each of the items (0 = did not report; 2 = reported in full; total score /26).
RESULTS: Of the 25,110 publications screened, 351 publications (based on 220 programs) met the inclusion criteria and were included for data extraction. No studies comprehensively reported on all TIDieR domains (mean TIDieR score = 15.7/26; range 7 to 25). Reporting was particularly poor among domains related to 'modifications', 'tailoring', and 'how well (planned/actual)'. "How well (planned)" assesses the intended delivery of an intervention, detailing the initial strategies and components as per the original design, while "how well (actual)" evaluates the extent to which the intervention was executed as planned during the study, including any deviations or modifications made in practice.
CONCLUSIONS: While there is evidence to suggest that diabetes prevention programs are efficacious, more thorough reporting of program content and delivery is needed to improve the ability for effective programs to be implemented or translated into different communities.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app