We have located links that may give you full text access.
Discrepant effect of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol on esophageal and gastric cancer risk in a nationwide cohort.
Gastric Cancer 2024 Februrary 29
BACKGROUND: The relationship between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and gastroesophageal cancer is not constant.
METHODS: In this population-based cohort study, 4.518 million cancer-free individuals among those who underwent national cancer screening in 2010 were enrolled and followed up until December 2017. HDL-C level was classified into eight groups at 10 mg/dL intervals. The risk of gastroesophageal cancers by HDL-C was measured using adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: During 8 years of follow-up, 38,362 gastric and 3022 esophageal cancers developed. Low HDL-C level was associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer; aHR was 1.19 (95% CI 1.09-1.30) for HDL-C < 30 mg/dL, 1.07 (95% CI 1.03-1.12) for HDL-C of 30-39 mg/dL, and 1.07 (95% CI 1.03-1.12) for HDL-C of 40-49 mg/dL comparing to HDL-C of 60-69 mg/dL. HDL-C was positively associated with esophageal cancer risk; aHR was 1.30 (1.12-1.51) for HDL-C of 70-79 mg/dL, 1.84 (1.53-2.22) for HDL-C of 80-89 mg/dL, 2.10 (1.67-2.61) for HDL-C ≥ 90 mg/dL. These site-specific effects of HDL-C were robust in sensitivity analyses. The range of HDL-C for the lowest cancer risk was different by sex and site. The hazardous effect of low HDL-C on gastric cancer was prominent in never and past smokers, and extremely high HDL-C increased gastric cancer risk (aHR 1.19; 95% CI 1.04-1.36) only in current smokers. Unfavorable effect of high HDL-C on gastroesophageal cancer risk was remarkable in smokers.
CONCLUSIONS: Low HDL-C increased the risk of gastric cancer, wherein high HDL-C was associated with esophageal cancer risk with discrepancies by sex and smoking status.
METHODS: In this population-based cohort study, 4.518 million cancer-free individuals among those who underwent national cancer screening in 2010 were enrolled and followed up until December 2017. HDL-C level was classified into eight groups at 10 mg/dL intervals. The risk of gastroesophageal cancers by HDL-C was measured using adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: During 8 years of follow-up, 38,362 gastric and 3022 esophageal cancers developed. Low HDL-C level was associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer; aHR was 1.19 (95% CI 1.09-1.30) for HDL-C < 30 mg/dL, 1.07 (95% CI 1.03-1.12) for HDL-C of 30-39 mg/dL, and 1.07 (95% CI 1.03-1.12) for HDL-C of 40-49 mg/dL comparing to HDL-C of 60-69 mg/dL. HDL-C was positively associated with esophageal cancer risk; aHR was 1.30 (1.12-1.51) for HDL-C of 70-79 mg/dL, 1.84 (1.53-2.22) for HDL-C of 80-89 mg/dL, 2.10 (1.67-2.61) for HDL-C ≥ 90 mg/dL. These site-specific effects of HDL-C were robust in sensitivity analyses. The range of HDL-C for the lowest cancer risk was different by sex and site. The hazardous effect of low HDL-C on gastric cancer was prominent in never and past smokers, and extremely high HDL-C increased gastric cancer risk (aHR 1.19; 95% CI 1.04-1.36) only in current smokers. Unfavorable effect of high HDL-C on gastroesophageal cancer risk was remarkable in smokers.
CONCLUSIONS: Low HDL-C increased the risk of gastric cancer, wherein high HDL-C was associated with esophageal cancer risk with discrepancies by sex and smoking status.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Clinical guideline on reversal of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with life threatening bleeding.European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2024 May 2
Aspiration under anesthesia: what happens after we sound the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist alarm?Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 August 27
Perioperative Management of Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Review.JAMA 2024 August 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app