[ 18 F]FDG and Lymphomas: Still a Winning Golden Couple in the Era of FAPI-Based Radiotracers.

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

The management of cardiogenic shock is an ongoing challenge. Despite all efforts and tremendous use of resources, mortality remains high. Whilst reversing the underlying cause, restoring/maintaining organ perfusion and function are cornerstones of management. The presence of comorbidities and preexisting organ dysfunction increases management complexity, aiming to integrate the needs of vital organs in each individual patient. This review provides a comprehensive overview of contemporary literature regarding the definition and classification of cardiogenic shock, its pathophysiology, diagnosis, laboratory evaluation, and monitoring. Further, we distill the latest evidence in pharmacologic therapy and the use of mechanical circulatory support including recently published randomized-controlled trials as well as future directions of research, integrating this within an international group of authors to provide a global perspective. Finally, we explore the need for individualization, especially in the face of neutral randomized trials which may be related to a dilution of a potential benefit of an intervention (i.e., average effect) in this heterogeneous clinical syndrome, including the use of novel biomarkers, artificial intelligence, and machine learning approaches to identify specific endotypes of cardiogenic shock (i.e., subclasses with distinct underlying biological/molecular mechanisms) to support a more personalized medicine beyond the syndromic approach of cardiogenic shock.

Management of cardiogenic shock: state-of-the-art.

Intensive Care Medicine

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly portal vein thrombosis, is common in patients with cirrhosis. Misconceptions around the increased bleeding risk in this patient group may lead to delayed and/or inadequate anticoagulation. This nutshell review focusses on the approach to management including the role of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of VTE in patients with cirrhosis.

Prevention and management of venous thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis.

British Journal of Haematology

Autoimmune neuropathies are a heterogeneous group of immune-mediated disorders of the peripheral nerves. Guillain-Barr&#xe9; syndrome (GBS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) are the archetypal acute and chronic forms. Over the past few decades, pathogenic antibodies targeting antigens of the peripheral nervous system and driving peripheral nerve damage in selected patients have been described. Moreover, the detection of these antibodies has diagnostic and therapeutic implications that have prompted a modification of the GBS and CIDP diagnostic algorithms. GBS diagnosis is based in clinical criteria, and systematic testing of anti-ganglioside antibodies is not required. Nonetheless, a positive anti-ganglioside antibody test may support the clinical suspicion when diagnosis of GBS (GM1 IgG), Miller Fisher (GQ1b IgG), or acute sensory-ataxic (GD1b IgG) syndromes is uncertain. Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) IgM and anti-disialosyl IgM antibodies are key in the diagnosis of anti-MAG neuropathy and chronic ataxic neuropathy, ophthalmoplegia, M-protein, cold agglutinins, and disialosyl antibodies spectrum neuropathies, respectively, and help differentiating these conditions from CIDP. Recently, the field has been boosted by the discovery of pathogenic antibodies targeting proteins of the node of Ranvier contactin-1, contactin-associated protein 1, and nodal and paranodal isoforms of neurofascin (NF140, NF186, or NF155). These antibodies define subgroups of patients with specific clinical (most importantly poor or partial response to conventional therapies and excellent response to anti-CD20 therapy) and pathologic (node of Ranvier disruption in the absence of inflammation) features that led to the definition of the "autoimmune nodopathy" diagnostic category and to the incorporation of nodal/paranodal antibodies to clinical routine testing. The purpose of this review was to provide a practical vision for the general neurologist of the use of antibodies in the clinical assessment of autoimmune neuropathies.

Antibodies in Autoimmune Neuropathies: What to Test, How to Test, Why to Test.

Neurology

Ventricular arrhythmias associated with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and the capacity to cause sudden cardiac death (SCD), referred to as 'malignant MVP', are an increasingly recognised, albeit rare, phenomenon. SCD can occur without significant mitral regurgitation, implying an interaction between mechanical derangements affecting the mitral valve apparatus and left ventricle. Risk stratification of these arrhythmias is an important clinical and public health issue to provide precise and targeted management. Evaluation requires patient and family history, physical examination and electrophysiological and imaging-based modalities. We provide a review of arrhythmogenic MVP, exploring its epidemiology, demographics, clinical presentation, mechanisms linking MVP to SCD, markers of disease severity, testing modalities and management, and discuss the importance of risk stratification. Even with recently improved understanding, it remains challenging how best to weight the prognostic importance of clinical, imaging and electrophysiological data to determine a clear high-risk arrhythmogenic profile in which an ICD should be used for the primary prevention of SCD.

Arrhythmogenic Mitral Valve Prolapse: Can We Risk Stratify and Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death?

Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review

Heart-lungs interactions are related to the interplay between the cardiovascular and the respiratory system. They result from the respiratory-induced changes in intrathoracic pressure, which are transmitted to the cardiac cavities and to the changes in alveolar pressure, which may impact the lung microvessels. In spontaneously breathing patients, consequences of heart-lungs interactions are during inspiration an increase in right ventricular preload and afterload, a decrease in left ventricular preload and an increase in left ventricular afterload. In mechanically ventilated patients, consequences of heart-lungs interactions are during mechanical insufflation a decrease in right ventricular preload, an increase in right ventricular afterload, an increase in left ventricular preload and a decrease in left ventricular afterload. Physiologically and during normal breathing, heart-lungs interactions do not lead to significant hemodynamic consequences. Nevertheless, in some clinical settings such as acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute left heart failure or acute respiratory distress syndrome, heart-lungs interactions may lead to significant hemodynamic consequences. These are linked to complex pathophysiological mechanisms, including a marked inspiratory negativity of intrathoracic pressure, a marked inspiratory increase in transpulmonary pressure and an increase in intra-abdominal pressure. The most recent application of heart-lungs interactions is the prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. The first test to be developed using heart-lungs interactions was the respiratory variation of pulse pressure. Subsequently, many other dynamic fluid responsiveness tests using heart-lungs interactions have been developed, such as the respiratory variations of pulse contour-based stroke volume or the respiratory variations of the inferior or superior vena cava diameters. All these tests share the same limitations, the most frequent being low tidal volume ventilation, persistent spontaneous breathing activity and cardiac arrhythmia. Nevertheless, when their main limitations are properly addressed, all these tests can help intensivists in the decision-making process regarding fluid administration and fluid removal in critically ill patients.

Heart-Lungs interactions: the basics and clinical implications.

Annals of Intensive Care

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. There has been remarkable progress in the treatment of HF over recent years with the establishment of guideline-directed medical therapies including: (1) Beta-blockers, (2) renal angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition (i.e., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEi], aldosterone receptor blocker [ARB] or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI]); (3) mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and (4) sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). However, there are challenges to the implementation of these medications in patients with concomitant CKD due to increased vulnerability to common side-effects (including worsening renal function, hyperkalaemia, hypotension), and most of the pivotal trials which provide evidence of the efficacy of these medications excluded patients with severe CKD. Patients with CKD and HF often have regular healthcare encounters with multiple professionals and can receive conflicting guidance regarding their medication. Thus, despite being at higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events, patients who have both HF and CKD are more likely to be under-optimised on evidence-based therapies. This review is an updated summary of the evidence available for the management of HF (including reduced, mildly reduced and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction) in patients with various stages of CKD. The review covers the evidence for recommended medications, devices such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), intravenous (IV) iron, and discusses how frailty affects the management of these patients. It also considers emerging evidence for the prevention of HF in the cohort of patients with CKD. It synthesises the available evidence regarding when to temporarily stop, continue or rechallenge medications in this cohort. Chronic HF in context of CKD remains a challenging scenario for clinicians to manage, which is usually complicated by frailty, multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Treatment should be tailored to a patients individual needs and management in specialised cardio-renal clinics with a multi-disciplinary team approach has been recommended. This review offers a concise summary on this expansive topic.

An Updated Review of the Management of Chronic Heart Failure in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine

Since the 1960s, cardiologists have adopted several binary classification systems for acute myocardial infarction (MI) that facilitated improved patient management. Conversely, for chronic stable manifestations of myocardial ischaemia, various classifications have emerged over time, often with conflicting terminology-e.g. 'stable coronary artery disease' (CAD), 'stable ischaemic heart disease', and 'chronic coronary syndromes' (CCS). While the 2019 European guidelines introduced CCS to impart symmetry with 'acute coronary syndromes' (ACS), the 2023 American guidelines endorsed the alternative term 'chronic coronary disease'. An unintended consequence of these competing classifications is perpetuation of the restrictive terms 'coronary' and 'disease', often connoting only a singular obstructive CAD mechanism. It is now important to advance a more broadly inclusive terminology for both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of angina and myocardial ischaemia that fosters conceptual clarity and unifies dyssynchronous nomenclatures across guidelines. We, therefore, propose a new binary classification of 'acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes' and 'non-acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes', which comprises both obstructive epicardial and non-obstructive pathogenetic mechanisms, including microvascular dysfunction, vasospastic disorders, and non-coronary causes. We herein retain accepted categories of ACS, ST-segment elevation MI, and non-ST-segment elevation MI, as important subsets for which revascularization is of proven clinical benefit, as well as new terms like ischaemia and MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Overall, such a more encompassing nomenclature better aligns, unifies, and harmonizes different pathophysiologic causes of myocardial ischaemia and should result in more refined diagnostic and therapeutic approaches targeted to the multiple pathobiological precipitants of angina pectoris, ischaemia and infarction.

Myocardial ischaemic syndromes: a new nomenclature to harmonize evolving international clinical practice guidelines.

European Heart Journal

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a rare systemic disease characterized by granulomatous inflammation of the respiratory tract and necrotizing vasculitis of small and medium vessels often associated with the production of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) directed mainly against leukocyte proteinase 3 (PR3). Usually, it involves upper airways, lungs, and kidneys, however any organ may be affected. The diagnosis is based on clinical, radiological, and serological findings. Biopsies, although strongly recommended, are not always feasible and often provides non-specific features. ANCA plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of GPA; nevertheless, ANCA detection is not a substitute for biopsy, which plays an important role in suspected cases, particularly when histological confirmation cannot be obtained. Significant advances have been made in classification criteria and phenotyping of the disease, particularly in determining the nuances between PR3-ANCA and myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCA vasculitis. This has led to better characterization of patients and the development of targeted treatment in the future. In addition, better identification of cytokine and immunological profiles may result in immuno-phenotyping becoming a new approach to identify patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). Due to the chronic relapsing-remitting nature, strict follow-up of GPA is necessary to provide appropriate management. The search for the accurate marker of disease activity and to predict relapse is still ongoing and no predictor has been found to reliably guide therapeutic decision-making.

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis: clinical characteristics and updates in diagnosis.

Frontiers in Medicine

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) that predispose individuals to thrombotic events and pregnancy-related complications. APS can occur as a primary condition or in association with other autoimmune diseases, most commonly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Catastrophic APS (CAPS) is a rare, severe variant of APS, marked by rapid-onset, widespread thrombosis leading to multi-organ failure, often triggered by infections, surgical procedures, or cessation of anticoagulation therapy. Both APS and CAPS present significant clinical challenges due to their potential for severe morbidity and mortality. This comprehensive review aims to provide a detailed overview of the pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnostic criteria, and management strategies for APS and CAPS. The review highlights the immunological mechanisms underlying APS, including the role of aPLs, complement system activation, and endothelial cell dysfunction in developing thrombosis. It also outlines the clinical manifestations of APS, such as venous and arterial thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity, and neurological symptoms, along with the diagnostic criteria based on clinical and laboratory findings. The review delves into its pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and diagnostic challenges in the context of CAPS, emphasizing the need for immediate and intensive therapy to manage this life-threatening condition. Current management strategies for APS, including anticoagulant therapy, immunomodulatory treatments, and specific interventions for pregnancy-related complications, are discussed. The review highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for CAPS, combining anticoagulation, high-dose corticosteroids, plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulin. The review also addresses the prognosis and long-term outcomes for patients with APS and CAPS, underlining the necessity for ongoing monitoring and follow-up to prevent recurrent thrombotic events and manage chronic complications. Finally, future directions in research are explored, focusing on emerging therapies, biomarkers for early diagnosis, and the need for clinical trials to advance the understanding and treatment of these complex syndromes. By enhancing the understanding of APS and CAPS, this review aims to improve diagnosis, treatment, and patient care, ultimately leading to better health outcomes for those affected by these conditions.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of Pathogenesis, Clinical Features, and Management Strategies.

Curēus

Early identification of kidney dysfunction in patients with advanced heart failure is crucial for timely interventions. In addition to elevations in serum creatinine, kidney dysfunction encompasses inadequate maintenance of sodium and volume homeostasis, retention of uremic solutes, and disrupted endocrine functions. Hemodynamic derangements and maladaptive neurohormonal upregulations contribute to fluctuations in kidney indices and electrolytes that may recover with guideline-directed medical therapy. Quantifying the extent of underlying irreversible intrinsic kidney disease is crucial in predicting whether optimization of congestion and guideline-directed medical therapy can stabilize kidney function. This scientific statement focuses on clinical management of patients experiencing kidney dysfunction through the trajectory of advanced heart failure, with specific focus on (1) the conceptual framework for appropriate evaluation of kidney dysfunction within the context of clinical trajectories in advanced heart failure, including in the consideration of advanced heart failure therapies; (2) preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative approaches to evaluation and management of kidney disease for advanced surgical therapies (durable left ventricular assist device/heart transplantation) and kidney replacement therapies; and (3) the key concepts in palliative care and decision-making processes unique to individuals with concomitant advanced heart failure and kidney disease.

[ 18 F]FDG and Lymphomas: Still a Winning Golden Couple in the Era of FAPI-Based Radiotracers.

Full text links

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

[ 18 F]FDG and Lymphomas: Still a Winning Golden Couple in the Era of FAPI-Based Radiotracers.

Full text links

Related Resources

Trending Papers

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app