We have located links that may give you full text access.
Analysis on the risk of myasthenia gravis related to immune checkpoint inhibitors based on the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.
Cancer Medicine 2023 September 20
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of myasthenia gravis (MG) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).
METHODS: Adverse event (AE) reports related to MG, myasthenic syndrome, and MG crisis for durvalumab, atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and ipilimumab in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q1 2004 to Q3 2022 were collected. The proportional reporting odds ratio (PRR) method was used to evaluate the correlation between the six drugs and the three AEs. Statistical significance was defined as having reports ≥3, PRR ≥ 2, and chi-square (χ2 ) ≥ 4.
RESULTS: A total of 36, 78, 276, 380, 5, and 53 AE reports were collected for durvalumab, atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and ipilimumab, respectively. For myasthenic syndrome, the PRR values reflecting the correlation with the drugs were 27.83 (χ2 = 102.66), 26.20 (χ2 = 235.67), 44.17 (χ2 = 1313.98), 32.09 (χ2 = 1229.54), 21.31 (χ2 = 151.15), and 0 for durvalumab, atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and ipilimumab, respectively. For MG, the PRR values reflecting the correlation with the drugs were 24.21 (χ2 = 682.04), 18.34 (χ2 = 900.27), 39.32 (χ2 = 7945.15), 26.93 (χ2 = 6636.45), 14.73 (χ2 = 566.47), and 15.69 (χ2 = 54.77) for durvalumab, atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and ipilimumab, respectively. For MG crisis, there were no data for durvalumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, and ipilimumab; the PRR values reflecting the correlation with the drugs were 16.54 (χ2 = 225.23) and 9.20 (χ2 = 119.14) for pembrolizumab and nivolumab, respectively. All six drugs were statistically correlated with their corresponding AEs.
CONCLUSIONS: ICI may lead to ICIs-associated MG during therapy. Analysis of FAERS data identified signals for AEs of MG with ICI regimens. Practitioners should consider the factors that may increase the likelihood of MG. The findings support a continued surveillance and risk factor identification.
METHODS: Adverse event (AE) reports related to MG, myasthenic syndrome, and MG crisis for durvalumab, atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and ipilimumab in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from Q1 2004 to Q3 2022 were collected. The proportional reporting odds ratio (PRR) method was used to evaluate the correlation between the six drugs and the three AEs. Statistical significance was defined as having reports ≥3, PRR ≥ 2, and chi-square (χ2 ) ≥ 4.
RESULTS: A total of 36, 78, 276, 380, 5, and 53 AE reports were collected for durvalumab, atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and ipilimumab, respectively. For myasthenic syndrome, the PRR values reflecting the correlation with the drugs were 27.83 (χ2 = 102.66), 26.20 (χ2 = 235.67), 44.17 (χ2 = 1313.98), 32.09 (χ2 = 1229.54), 21.31 (χ2 = 151.15), and 0 for durvalumab, atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and ipilimumab, respectively. For MG, the PRR values reflecting the correlation with the drugs were 24.21 (χ2 = 682.04), 18.34 (χ2 = 900.27), 39.32 (χ2 = 7945.15), 26.93 (χ2 = 6636.45), 14.73 (χ2 = 566.47), and 15.69 (χ2 = 54.77) for durvalumab, atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and ipilimumab, respectively. For MG crisis, there were no data for durvalumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, and ipilimumab; the PRR values reflecting the correlation with the drugs were 16.54 (χ2 = 225.23) and 9.20 (χ2 = 119.14) for pembrolizumab and nivolumab, respectively. All six drugs were statistically correlated with their corresponding AEs.
CONCLUSIONS: ICI may lead to ICIs-associated MG during therapy. Analysis of FAERS data identified signals for AEs of MG with ICI regimens. Practitioners should consider the factors that may increase the likelihood of MG. The findings support a continued surveillance and risk factor identification.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Restrictive fluid resuscitation in septic shock patients has lower mortality and organ dysfunction rates than standard therapy.Shock 2023 November 11
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app