We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Efficacy of Topical Finasteride (0.25%) in Combination with Minoxidil (5%) Against 5% Minoxidil or 0.25% Finasteride Alone in Male Androgenetic Alopecia: A Pilot, Randomized Open-Label Study.
BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss in males which remains a therapeutic challenge.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of topical 5% minoxidil and 0.25% finasteride combination (MNF) over 5% minoxidil (MNX) or 0.25% finasteride (FNS) alone by assessing hair count, physician assessment score (PAS), and patient satisfaction score (PSS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pilot randomized open-label study where 60 male patients with AGA ≥ III grade were randomized into three treatment groups and evaluated over 24 weeks. Improvement in hair count was assessed manually using dermoscopy. Global photographs were used to assess PAS. Side effects were evaluated using relevant laboratory investigations.
RESULTS: At the 12th and 24th week, all three groups showed significant improvement in total hair density as compared to baseline ( P < 0.001). None of the groups was superior to the other ( P > 0.05) at the 12th week but at 24th week, MNF was comparatively superior ( P < 0.02). At the 12th week and 24th week, all three groups showed significant improvement in terminal hair density as compared to baseline ( P < 0.001). In the 12th week, MNF was comparatively superior ( P = 0.028) and at the 24th week, MNF was comparatively superior ( P < 0.02). PAS and PSS were significantly better with MNF and MNX compared to FNS ( P < 0.004). Side effects such as scaling and itching were reported with MNF and MNX.
CONCLUSION: Topical minoxidil 5% and finasteride 0.25% had an overall better efficacy compared to monotherapy without significant side effects.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of topical 5% minoxidil and 0.25% finasteride combination (MNF) over 5% minoxidil (MNX) or 0.25% finasteride (FNS) alone by assessing hair count, physician assessment score (PAS), and patient satisfaction score (PSS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pilot randomized open-label study where 60 male patients with AGA ≥ III grade were randomized into three treatment groups and evaluated over 24 weeks. Improvement in hair count was assessed manually using dermoscopy. Global photographs were used to assess PAS. Side effects were evaluated using relevant laboratory investigations.
RESULTS: At the 12th and 24th week, all three groups showed significant improvement in total hair density as compared to baseline ( P < 0.001). None of the groups was superior to the other ( P > 0.05) at the 12th week but at 24th week, MNF was comparatively superior ( P < 0.02). At the 12th week and 24th week, all three groups showed significant improvement in terminal hair density as compared to baseline ( P < 0.001). In the 12th week, MNF was comparatively superior ( P = 0.028) and at the 24th week, MNF was comparatively superior ( P < 0.02). PAS and PSS were significantly better with MNF and MNX compared to FNS ( P < 0.004). Side effects such as scaling and itching were reported with MNF and MNX.
CONCLUSION: Topical minoxidil 5% and finasteride 0.25% had an overall better efficacy compared to monotherapy without significant side effects.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Monitoring Macro- and Microcirculation in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review.Avicenna Journal of Medicine 2023 July
ASA Consensus-based Guidance on Preoperative Management of Patients on Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.Anesthesiology 2023 November 21
Common postbariatric surgery emergencies for the acute care surgeon: What you need to know.Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2023 December 2
Sodium bicarbonate Ringer's solution for hemorrhagic shock: A meta-analysis comparing crystalloid solutions.American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2023 November 6
Association between postinduction hypotension and postoperative mortality: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2023 November 22
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app