We have located links that may give you full text access.
Early Outcomes of Different Reconstruction Procedures in Radical Distal Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Study.
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 2023 September 7
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term effects of Billroth I (B-I), Billroth Ⅱ (B-Ⅱ), Billroth Ⅱ+Braun (B-B), and Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction procedures in radical distal gastrectomy using propensity score matching (PSM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 1994 patients who underwent radical distal gastrectomy in the past 10 years were retrospectively analyzed. Subsequently, PSM analyses were performed 3 times on the 4 reconstruction procedures, and the matching capacity was set to 0.01. Data regarding control variables and outcome indicators obtained using PSM were compared and analyzed.
RESULTS: Compared with the other reconstruction procedures, patients in the B-I group had shorter operation time (P=0.002), fewer abdominal drainage tubes (P<0.001), and a lower risk of postoperative gastroparesis (P=0.001) and gastrointestinal bleeding (P=0.034), but tended to experience a longer postoperative indwelling time of bladder catheter (P<0.001), gastrointestinal decompression (P<0.001), fasting (P=0.001), and hospital stays (P=0.005). The B-B group tended to have fewer applications of the abdominal drainage tube (P=0.014), a lower risk of postoperative gastrointestinal fistula (P=0.040), shorter postoperative time of gastrointestinal decompression (P=0.043), fasting (P<0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (P<0.001) than the R-Y group. Furthermore, the B-B group had a shorter postoperative time for gastrointestinal decompression (P=0.014) and fasting (P<0.001) than the B-Ⅱ group.
CONCLUSION: Billroth I reconstruction has the advantages of simple operation, short operative time, and few early complications, but tends to result in a long recovery time during postoperative hospitalization. The B-B operation is associated with faster postoperative recovery than the R-Y or B-Ⅱ operation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 1994 patients who underwent radical distal gastrectomy in the past 10 years were retrospectively analyzed. Subsequently, PSM analyses were performed 3 times on the 4 reconstruction procedures, and the matching capacity was set to 0.01. Data regarding control variables and outcome indicators obtained using PSM were compared and analyzed.
RESULTS: Compared with the other reconstruction procedures, patients in the B-I group had shorter operation time (P=0.002), fewer abdominal drainage tubes (P<0.001), and a lower risk of postoperative gastroparesis (P=0.001) and gastrointestinal bleeding (P=0.034), but tended to experience a longer postoperative indwelling time of bladder catheter (P<0.001), gastrointestinal decompression (P<0.001), fasting (P=0.001), and hospital stays (P=0.005). The B-B group tended to have fewer applications of the abdominal drainage tube (P=0.014), a lower risk of postoperative gastrointestinal fistula (P=0.040), shorter postoperative time of gastrointestinal decompression (P=0.043), fasting (P<0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (P<0.001) than the R-Y group. Furthermore, the B-B group had a shorter postoperative time for gastrointestinal decompression (P=0.014) and fasting (P<0.001) than the B-Ⅱ group.
CONCLUSION: Billroth I reconstruction has the advantages of simple operation, short operative time, and few early complications, but tends to result in a long recovery time during postoperative hospitalization. The B-B operation is associated with faster postoperative recovery than the R-Y or B-Ⅱ operation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Clinical guideline on reversal of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with life threatening bleeding.European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2024 May 2
Aspiration under anesthesia: what happens after we sound the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist alarm?Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 August 27
Perioperative Management of Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Review.JAMA 2024 August 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app