We have located links that may give you full text access.
Relationship between medial meniscus extrusion and damage to medial stabilizers: Should extrusion be considered significant only when more than 3 mm?
Knee 2023 September 5
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted with patients with anterior and medial extrusion of the medial meniscus (MM-AE, MM-ME) to investigate the relationship of the amount of extrusion with damage to the meniscus, meniscofemoral ligament (MFL), meniscotibial ligament (MTL), presence of effusion, osteoarthritis (OA) grade and other medial stablizers. A cut-off value for significant MM-ME was also suggested.
METHODS: All patients aged 18 and above who had measurable MM extrusion on knee MRI were included. Patients with acute injury detected on knee MRI and any disease that could disrupt the anatomy were not included. The relationship between the amount of MM-AE, MM-ME and the investigated comorbidities were evaluated. The patients were divided into two: those with and without positive findings for each comorbidities. The amount of MM-AE, MM-ME were evaluated. ROC analysis was undertaken for significant differences, and cut-off values were determined.
RESULTS: There was a correlation between MM-ME and age, weight, and BMI (p < 0.001, p = 0.027, p = 0.025, respectively). The amount of MM-ME was higher in the groups with OA (p = 0.007), MTL damage (p < 0.001), MFL damage (p < 0.001), meniscus damage (p < 0.001), effusion (p < 0.001), and the amount of MM-AE was higher in the groups with OA (p = 0.042), effusion (p = 0.002). The cut-off values of MM-ME were determined to be 2.69 mm (MTL), 2.65 mm (MFL), 2.49 mm (meniscus), and 2.85 mm (OA).
CONCLUSION: OA grade, effusion, and meniscus, MTL, and MFL damage were all found to be related to the amount of MM-ME. MM-ME values 2.49-2.85 mm may indicate meniscus, MFL, MTL damage and OA.
METHODS: All patients aged 18 and above who had measurable MM extrusion on knee MRI were included. Patients with acute injury detected on knee MRI and any disease that could disrupt the anatomy were not included. The relationship between the amount of MM-AE, MM-ME and the investigated comorbidities were evaluated. The patients were divided into two: those with and without positive findings for each comorbidities. The amount of MM-AE, MM-ME were evaluated. ROC analysis was undertaken for significant differences, and cut-off values were determined.
RESULTS: There was a correlation between MM-ME and age, weight, and BMI (p < 0.001, p = 0.027, p = 0.025, respectively). The amount of MM-ME was higher in the groups with OA (p = 0.007), MTL damage (p < 0.001), MFL damage (p < 0.001), meniscus damage (p < 0.001), effusion (p < 0.001), and the amount of MM-AE was higher in the groups with OA (p = 0.042), effusion (p = 0.002). The cut-off values of MM-ME were determined to be 2.69 mm (MTL), 2.65 mm (MFL), 2.49 mm (meniscus), and 2.85 mm (OA).
CONCLUSION: OA grade, effusion, and meniscus, MTL, and MFL damage were all found to be related to the amount of MM-ME. MM-ME values 2.49-2.85 mm may indicate meniscus, MFL, MTL damage and OA.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Monitoring Macro- and Microcirculation in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review.Avicenna Journal of Medicine 2023 July
Euglycemic Ketoacidosis in Two Patients Without Diabetes After Introduction of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.Diabetes Care 2023 November 22
ASA Consensus-based Guidance on Preoperative Management of Patients on Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.Anesthesiology 2023 November 21
Tranexamic Acid for Traumatic Injury in the Emergency Setting: A Systematic Review and Bias-Adjusted Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Annals of Emergency Medicine 2023 November 22
Association between postinduction hypotension and postoperative mortality: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2023 November 22
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app