We have located links that may give you full text access.
Association of CD4 count and HIV viral load with risk of Non-AIDS-defining cancers.
AIDS 2023 June 29
OBJECTIVES: HIV-induced immunodeficiency contributes to an increased risk of non-AIDS-defining cancers (NADC). This study aims to identify the most predictive viral load (VL) or CD4 measures of NADC risk among people living with HIV (PLWH).
DESIGN: Extracted from South Carolina electronic HIV reporting system, we studied adult PLWH who were cancer-free at baseline and had at least 6 months of follow-up since HIV diagnosis between January 2005 and December 2020.
METHODS: Using multiple proportional hazards models, risk of NADC was investigated in relation to twelve measures of VL and CD4 at three different time intervals before NADC diagnosis. The best VL/CD4 predictor(s) and final model were determined using Akaike's information criterion.
RESULTS: Among 10,413 eligible PLWH, 449 (4.31%) developed at least one type of NADC. After adjusting for potential confounders, the best predictors of NADC were the proportion of days with viral suppression (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47 (>25% and ≤50% vs =0), 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.28, 0.79]) and proportion of days with low CD4 count (AIC = 7201.35) (HR: 12.28 (>75% vs = 0), 95% CI: [9.29, 16.23]).
CONCLUSIONS: VL and CD4 measures are strongly associated with risk of NADC. In analyses examining three time windows, proportion of days with low CD4 count was the best CD4 predictor for each time window. However, the best VL predictor varied across time windows. Thus, using the best combination of VL and CD4 measures for a specific time window should be considered when predicting NADC risk.
DESIGN: Extracted from South Carolina electronic HIV reporting system, we studied adult PLWH who were cancer-free at baseline and had at least 6 months of follow-up since HIV diagnosis between January 2005 and December 2020.
METHODS: Using multiple proportional hazards models, risk of NADC was investigated in relation to twelve measures of VL and CD4 at three different time intervals before NADC diagnosis. The best VL/CD4 predictor(s) and final model were determined using Akaike's information criterion.
RESULTS: Among 10,413 eligible PLWH, 449 (4.31%) developed at least one type of NADC. After adjusting for potential confounders, the best predictors of NADC were the proportion of days with viral suppression (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47 (>25% and ≤50% vs =0), 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.28, 0.79]) and proportion of days with low CD4 count (AIC = 7201.35) (HR: 12.28 (>75% vs = 0), 95% CI: [9.29, 16.23]).
CONCLUSIONS: VL and CD4 measures are strongly associated with risk of NADC. In analyses examining three time windows, proportion of days with low CD4 count was the best CD4 predictor for each time window. However, the best VL predictor varied across time windows. Thus, using the best combination of VL and CD4 measures for a specific time window should be considered when predicting NADC risk.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Restrictive fluid resuscitation in septic shock patients has lower mortality and organ dysfunction rates than standard therapy.Shock 2023 November 11
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app