COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Unicompartmental replacement and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. A comparative study after 5-10 years' follow-up

N S Broughton, J H Newman, R A Baily
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 1986, 68 (3): 447-52
3733813
We have made a retrospective comparison between the results of 49 high tibial osteotomies and 42 unicompartmental replacement arthroplasties performed for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee, assessed 5 to 10 years after operation. The type of operation depended on the policy of the consultant responsible for treatment but analysis of the pre-operative findings showed that the two groups were sufficiently similar for direct comparison between them. In the replacement group, 32 (76%) were good, 4 were fair, 3 were poor and 3 had been revised. In the osteotomy group 21 (43%) were good, 11 were fair, 7 were poor and 10 had been revised. It was concluded that, in this series, the results of unicompartmental replacement were significantly better and that this group had shown no sign of late deterioration.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Trending Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
3733813
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.