Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The effects of sildenafil citrate on intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: An increase in vascular resistance of uterine vessels is associated with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Sildenafil citrate, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor that stabilizes cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and increases nitric oxide levels, improves placental perfusion by dilation of spiral arteries and is beneficial in managing IUGR. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of sildenafil citrate in improving perinatal outcomes in IUGR pregnancies.

METHODS: Meta-analysis was performed on data extracted from all studies specific to sildenafil citrate in IUGR management, searching relevant articles on PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Publications identified by the manual search, based on references in reviews, were also included. Dichotomous results were presented as risk ratio (95% confidence interval), while continuous results were expressed as mean difference (MD); samples represented by the random effects model.

RESULTS: Nine trials were included where the sildenafil citrate effect was compared with a placebo or no intervention. A significant increase in birth weight [SMD (95% CI), 0.69 (0.31, 1.07)] was seen in IUGR pregnancies managed with sildenafil. However, gestational age (SMD (95% CI), 0.44 (-0.05, 0.94], fetal death rate [RR (95% CI), 0.56 (0.17, 1.79)] in IUGR pregnancies was not changed by sildenafil. Neonatal death [RR (95% CI), 0.93 (0.47, 1.86)] and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions [RR (95% CI), 0.76 (0.50, 1.17)] were not significantly different between sildenafil and control groups.

CONCLUSION: Sildenafil citrate increases birth weight and prolonged pregnancies but did not affect stillbirth rate, neonatal death, and NICU admission.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in PROSPERO on September 18, 2021 (CRD42021271992).

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app