We have located links that may give you full text access.
Association Between Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody and Waitlist Outcomes in the 2018 Heart Allocation System.
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 2023 May 32
BACKGROUND: The impact of heart transplant (HT) waitlist candidate sensitization on waitlist outcomes in the US is unknown.
METHODS: Adult waitlist outcomes in OPTN (Oct 2018 - Sept 2022) by calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) were modeled to identify thresholds of clinical significance. The primary outcome was the rate of HT by cPRA category (low: 0-35, middle: >35-90, high: >90) assessed using multivariable competing risk analysis (compete: waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration). The secondary outcome was waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration.
RESULTS: The elevated cPRA categories were associated with lower rates of HT. Candidates in the middle (35-90) and high cPRA categories (>90) had an adjusted 24% lower rate (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.92) and 61% lower rate (HR 0.39 95% CI. 0.33-0.47) of HT than the lowest category, respectively. Waitlist candidates in the high cPRA category listed in the top acuity strata (Statuses 1, 2) had increased rates of delisting for death or deterioration compared to those in the low cPRA category (adjusted HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-5.5), however elevated cPRA (middle, high) was not associated with an increased rate of death and delisting when the cohort was considered as a whole.
CONCLUSION: Elevated cPRA was associated with reduced rates of HT across all waitlist acuity tiers. Among HT waitlist candidates listed at the top acuity strata, the high cPRA category was associated with increased rates of delisting due to death or deterioration. Elevated cPRA may require consideration for critically ill candidates under continuous allocation.
METHODS: Adult waitlist outcomes in OPTN (Oct 2018 - Sept 2022) by calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) were modeled to identify thresholds of clinical significance. The primary outcome was the rate of HT by cPRA category (low: 0-35, middle: >35-90, high: >90) assessed using multivariable competing risk analysis (compete: waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration). The secondary outcome was waitlist removal for death or clinical deterioration.
RESULTS: The elevated cPRA categories were associated with lower rates of HT. Candidates in the middle (35-90) and high cPRA categories (>90) had an adjusted 24% lower rate (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.92) and 61% lower rate (HR 0.39 95% CI. 0.33-0.47) of HT than the lowest category, respectively. Waitlist candidates in the high cPRA category listed in the top acuity strata (Statuses 1, 2) had increased rates of delisting for death or deterioration compared to those in the low cPRA category (adjusted HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-5.5), however elevated cPRA (middle, high) was not associated with an increased rate of death and delisting when the cohort was considered as a whole.
CONCLUSION: Elevated cPRA was associated with reduced rates of HT across all waitlist acuity tiers. Among HT waitlist candidates listed at the top acuity strata, the high cPRA category was associated with increased rates of delisting due to death or deterioration. Elevated cPRA may require consideration for critically ill candidates under continuous allocation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app