We have located links that may give you full text access.
A novel robotic radiation shielding device for electrophysiologic procedures: A prospective study.
American Heart Journal 2023 July
BACKGROUND: A robotic Radiaction Shielding System (RSS) was developed to provide a full-body protection to all medical personnel during fluoroscopy-guided procedures, by encapsulating the imaging beam and blocking scattered radiation.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate its efficacy in real-world electrophysiologic (EP) laboratory- both during ablations and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) procedures.
METHODS: A prospective controlled study comparing consecutive real-life EP procedures with and without RSS using highly sensitive sensors in different locations.
RESULTS: Thirty-five ablations and 19 CIED procedures were done without RSS installed and 31 ablations and 24 CIED procedures (17 with usage levels ≥70%) were done with RSS. Overall, there was 95% average usage level for ablations and 88% for CIEDs. For all procedures with ≥70% usage level and for all sensors, the radiation with RSS was significantly lower than radiation without RSS. For ablations, there was 87% reduction in radiation with RSS (76%-97% for different sensors). For CIEDs, there was 83% reduction in radiation with RSS (59%-92%). RSS usage did not increase procedure time and radiation time. User feedback showed a high-level of integration in the clinical workflow and safety profile for all types of EP procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: For both CIED and ablation procedures the radiation with RSS was significantly lower than without RSS. Higher usage level brings higher reduction rates. Thus, RSS may have an important role in full-body protection to all medical personnel from scattered radiation during EP and CIED procedures. Until more data is available, it is recommended to maintain existing standard shielding.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate its efficacy in real-world electrophysiologic (EP) laboratory- both during ablations and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) procedures.
METHODS: A prospective controlled study comparing consecutive real-life EP procedures with and without RSS using highly sensitive sensors in different locations.
RESULTS: Thirty-five ablations and 19 CIED procedures were done without RSS installed and 31 ablations and 24 CIED procedures (17 with usage levels ≥70%) were done with RSS. Overall, there was 95% average usage level for ablations and 88% for CIEDs. For all procedures with ≥70% usage level and for all sensors, the radiation with RSS was significantly lower than radiation without RSS. For ablations, there was 87% reduction in radiation with RSS (76%-97% for different sensors). For CIEDs, there was 83% reduction in radiation with RSS (59%-92%). RSS usage did not increase procedure time and radiation time. User feedback showed a high-level of integration in the clinical workflow and safety profile for all types of EP procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: For both CIED and ablation procedures the radiation with RSS was significantly lower than without RSS. Higher usage level brings higher reduction rates. Thus, RSS may have an important role in full-body protection to all medical personnel from scattered radiation during EP and CIED procedures. Until more data is available, it is recommended to maintain existing standard shielding.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Restrictive fluid resuscitation in septic shock patients has lower mortality and organ dysfunction rates than standard therapy.Shock 2023 November 11
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app