We have located links that may give you full text access.
Prenatal Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders: Deep Learning Radiomics of Pelvic MRI.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI 2023 May 25
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic performance of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) by prenatal MRI is unsatisfactory. Deep learning radiomics (DLR) has the potential to quantify the MRI features of PAS.
PURPOSE: To explore whether DLR from MRI can be used to identify pregnancies with PAS.
STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
POPULATION: 324 pregnant women (mean age, 33.3 years) suspected PAS (170 training and 72 validation from institution 1, 82 external validation from institution 2) with clinicopathologically proved PAS (206 PAS, 118 non-PAS).
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, turbo spin-echo T2-weighted images.
ASSESSMENT: The DLR features were extracted using the MedicalNet. An MRI-based DLR model incorporating DLR signature, clinical model (different clinical characteristics between PAS and non-PAS groups), and MRI morphologic model (radiologists' binary assessment for the PAS diagnosis) was developed. These models were constructed in the training dataset and then validated in the validation datasets.
STATISTICAL TESTS: The Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U, χ2 or Fisher exact test, Kappa, dice similarity coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficients, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression, multivariate logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, DeLong test, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), calibration curve with Hosmer-Lemeshow test, decision curve analysis (DCA). P < 0.05 indicated a significant difference.
RESULTS: The MRI-based DLR model had a higher area under the curve than the clinical model in three datasets (0.880 vs. 0.741, 0.861 vs. 0.772, 0.852 vs. 0.675, respectively) or MRI morphologic model in training and independent validation datasets (0.880 vs. 0.760, 0.861, vs. 0.781, respectively). The NRI and IDI were 0.123 and 0.104, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test had nonsignificant statistics (P = 0.296 to 0.590). The DCA offered a net benefit at any threshold probability.
DATA CONCLUSION: An MRI-based DLR model may show better performance in diagnosing PAS than a clinical or MRI morphologic model.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
PURPOSE: To explore whether DLR from MRI can be used to identify pregnancies with PAS.
STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
POPULATION: 324 pregnant women (mean age, 33.3 years) suspected PAS (170 training and 72 validation from institution 1, 82 external validation from institution 2) with clinicopathologically proved PAS (206 PAS, 118 non-PAS).
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, turbo spin-echo T2-weighted images.
ASSESSMENT: The DLR features were extracted using the MedicalNet. An MRI-based DLR model incorporating DLR signature, clinical model (different clinical characteristics between PAS and non-PAS groups), and MRI morphologic model (radiologists' binary assessment for the PAS diagnosis) was developed. These models were constructed in the training dataset and then validated in the validation datasets.
STATISTICAL TESTS: The Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U, χ2 or Fisher exact test, Kappa, dice similarity coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficients, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression, multivariate logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, DeLong test, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), calibration curve with Hosmer-Lemeshow test, decision curve analysis (DCA). P < 0.05 indicated a significant difference.
RESULTS: The MRI-based DLR model had a higher area under the curve than the clinical model in three datasets (0.880 vs. 0.741, 0.861 vs. 0.772, 0.852 vs. 0.675, respectively) or MRI morphologic model in training and independent validation datasets (0.880 vs. 0.760, 0.861, vs. 0.781, respectively). The NRI and IDI were 0.123 and 0.104, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test had nonsignificant statistics (P = 0.296 to 0.590). The DCA offered a net benefit at any threshold probability.
DATA CONCLUSION: An MRI-based DLR model may show better performance in diagnosing PAS than a clinical or MRI morphologic model.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app