Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

External Validation of a Five-Tiered CT Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Five-Reader Study.

Background: A 5-tiered CT algorithm was proposed in 2022 for predicting whether a small (cT1a) solid renal mass represents clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Purpose: To perform an external-validation study of the proposed CT algorithm for diagnosis of ccRCC among small solid renal masses. Methods: This retrospective study included 93 patients [median age, 62 years; 42 women, 51 men] with 97 small solid renal masses on corticomedullary-phase contrast-enhanced CT performed between January 2012 and July 2022 that underwent surgical resection. Five readers (three attending radiologists, two clinical fellows) independently evaluated masses for mass-to-cortex corticomedullary attenuation ratio and heterogeneity score; these scores were used to derive the CT score by the previously proposed CT algorithm. The CT score's sensitivity, specificity, and PPV for ccRCC were calculated at threshold of ≥4, and NPV for ccRCC was calculated at threshold of ≥3 (consistent with thresholds in studies of the MRI-based clear-cell likelihood score and the CT algorithm's initial study). The CT score's sensitivity and specificity for papillary RCC were calculated at a threshold of ≤2. Interreader agreement was assessed using Gwet's AC1. Results: Overall, 61/97 (63%) masses were malignant; 44/97 (44%) were ccRCC. Across readers, CT score had sensitivity ranging from 47% to 95% [pooled sensitivity, 74% (95% CI, 68-80%)], specificity ranging from 19% to 83% [pooled specificity, 59% (95% CI, 52-67%)], PPV ranging from 48% to 76% [pooled PPV, 59% (95% CI, 49-71%)], and NPV ranging from 83% to 100% [pooled NPV, 90% (95% CI, 84-95%)], for ccRCC. CT score ≤2 had sensitivity ranging from 44% to 100% and specificity ranging from 77% to 98% for papillary RCC (representing 9/97 masses). Interreader agreement was substantial for attenuation score (AC1=0.70), poor for heterogeneity score (AC1=0.17), fair for 5-tiered CT score (AC1=0.32), and fair for dichotomous CT score at threshold of ≥4 (AC1=0.24; 95% CI, 0.14-0.33). Conclusion: The 5-tiered CT algorithm for evaluation of small solid renal masses was tested in an external sample and showed high NPV for ccRCC. Clinical Impact: The CT algorithm may be used for risk stratification and patient selection for active surveillance by identifying patients unlikely to have ccRCC.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app