Differences in risk factors and outcome after acute stroke in patients with tandem occlusion and those with isolated intracranial occlusion after endovascular treatment.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical features, treatment, and clinical outcome of patients with tandem occlusion and isolated intracranial occlusion through endovascular treatment (EVT).

METHODS: Patients with acute cerebral infarction who received EVT in two stroke centers were retrospectively included. According to MRI or CTA results, the patients were divided into tandem occlusion group or isolated intracranial occlusion group. The baseline data, etiological classification, treatment, post-stroke complications, image features, and clinical outcome were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the related factors affecting the prognosis of patients with EVT.

RESULTS: Among 161 patients with acute cerebral infarction, there were 33 cases (20.5%) in the tandem occlusion group and 128 cases (79.5%) in the isolated intracranial occlusion group. Compared with isolated intracranial occlusion, the patients with tandem occlusion had higher rates of large artery atherosclerosis (P = 0.028), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) (P = 0.023), bilateral infarction (P = 0.042), and longer time for endovascular procedure (P = 0.026). There was no significant statistical difference in 90-day mRS score between the two groups (P = 0.060). Multivariate logistic regression identified the following independent predictors of poor functional outcome: older age, high fasting blood glucose, infarction area > 1/3, and hemorrhagic transformation.

CONCLUSIONS: Compared with isolated intracranial occlusion, there was not a worse prognosis among patients with tandem occlusion who received EVT.