Refractive Outcomes With New Generation Formulas for IOL Power Calculation in Radial Keratotomy Patients.

PURPOSE: Radial keratotomies (RKs) are responsible for corneal irregularities resulting in biometric errors and lower best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) due to lower-order and higher-order optical aberrations. The aim of the study was to compare performances of new and old generation formulas in a population of RK patients.

METHODS: RK patients who underwent phacoemulsification with IOL implantation were retrospectively recruited. Inclusion criteria were availability of preoperative and 6-month postoperative BCVA assessment, topography, and tomography. Documented refraction instability, corneal ectasia, and previous ocular surgery except for RK were exclusion criteria. Mean prediction error (ME), mean absolute prediction error (MAE), and incidence of MAE > 0.25D were calculated for SRK-T, Barrett True K, EVO 2.0, Kane, and PEARL-DGS.

RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with a mean baseline BCVA of 0.32 ± 0.18 logMAR and a mean corneal root mean square (RMS) value of 1.59 ± 0.91 μm were included. EVO 2.0, Kane, and PEARL-DGS showed a significantly lower MAE and lower ME compared with all other formulas (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001) and a significant lower incidence of MAE >0.25D (P < 0.001). Significant differences were still detected when using 3-mm mean keratometry for IOL calculation.

CONCLUSIONS: PEARL-DGS, Kane, and EVO 2.0 formulas show superior accuracy in IOL power calculation compared with SRK-T and Barrett True K in RK patients, with no significant differences between the 3.