We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effect of increased gonadotropin dosing on maternal and neonatal outcomes in predicted poor responders undergoing IVF: follow-up of a randomized trial.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in women scheduled for IVF with predicted poor ovarian response, the effect of increased dosing of gonadotropin on maternal and neonatal outcomes compared with standard dosing.
STUDY DESIGN: We performed a follow-up study of an open-labelled randomized controlled trial comparing increased (225 or 300 IU/d) versus standard (150 IU/d) dose gonadotrophins on cumulative live birth rates. We randomized 661 women with a predicted poor ovarian response (based on their antral follicle count) scheduled for their first IVF/ICSI cycle. Here, we report on maternal and neonatal outcomes between increased and standard dosing groups.
RESULTS: There was a trend of increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in the increased gonadotrophin dose group compared with the standard group in both cumulative live birth pregnancies (14.8% vs. 7.8%, relative risk (RR) 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-3.74, P = 0.06) and live birth pregnancies in the first transfer (15.2% vs. 7.7%, RR 1.98, 95 %CI 0.93-4.19, P = 0.08), without reaching statistical significance. The occurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus was significantly higher in the increased gonadotrophin dose group (24/149, 16.1% vs. 8/128, 6.3%; risk ratio (RR) 2.58, 95 %CI 1.19 to 5.54, P = 0.02) in singleton pregnancies. In women with first embryo transfer cycle, maternal hypothyroidism occurred also more frequent in the increased gonadotrophin dose group than the standard group (16.0% vs. 6.8%, RR 2.34, 95 %CI:1.07-5.11, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: In women with predicted poor ovarian response, increased dosing of gonadotropin may result in an increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus and maternal hypothyroidism.
STUDY DESIGN: We performed a follow-up study of an open-labelled randomized controlled trial comparing increased (225 or 300 IU/d) versus standard (150 IU/d) dose gonadotrophins on cumulative live birth rates. We randomized 661 women with a predicted poor ovarian response (based on their antral follicle count) scheduled for their first IVF/ICSI cycle. Here, we report on maternal and neonatal outcomes between increased and standard dosing groups.
RESULTS: There was a trend of increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in the increased gonadotrophin dose group compared with the standard group in both cumulative live birth pregnancies (14.8% vs. 7.8%, relative risk (RR) 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-3.74, P = 0.06) and live birth pregnancies in the first transfer (15.2% vs. 7.7%, RR 1.98, 95 %CI 0.93-4.19, P = 0.08), without reaching statistical significance. The occurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus was significantly higher in the increased gonadotrophin dose group (24/149, 16.1% vs. 8/128, 6.3%; risk ratio (RR) 2.58, 95 %CI 1.19 to 5.54, P = 0.02) in singleton pregnancies. In women with first embryo transfer cycle, maternal hypothyroidism occurred also more frequent in the increased gonadotrophin dose group than the standard group (16.0% vs. 6.8%, RR 2.34, 95 %CI:1.07-5.11, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: In women with predicted poor ovarian response, increased dosing of gonadotropin may result in an increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus and maternal hypothyroidism.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app