A comparison of tertiary level NICU costs for infants born <1250 g supplemented with human versus bovine milk-based fortifiers.

BACKGROUND: Human milk-based fortifiers (HMBF) are more costly than bovine milk-based fortifiers (BMBF); but, the efficacy of human or bovine fortification for infants born <1250 g has yet to be fully elucidated. Our objective was to determine the effect of fortifier source on tertiary neonatal costs.

METHODS: Costs associated with tertiary neonatal care, including direct and indirect hospital expenditures, feed-related costs and physician billing were analysed retrospectively for participants of OptiMoM (NCT02137473), a blinded RCT comparing fortifier type for babies born <1250 g. A generalized linear model of cost according to fortifier type was created.

RESULTS: Mean [95% confidence interval] daily costs per patient, adjusted for birth gestation and weight, was significantly greater in the human than the BMBF group ($3,452 [$3,186 - $3,740] Canadian dollars (CAD) versus $2,451 [$2,257 - $2,662] CAD) respectively, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION: HMBF usage entails additional costs on NICU stay that should be considered with implementation.