Evaluation of the Diagnostic Efficacy of EC-Test for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Ambulatory People Living with HIV.
AIDS 2023 April 21
BACKGROUND: Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is more likely to develop into active tuberculosis (ATB), recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis fusion protein (ESAT6/CFP10, EC) Test is a latest developed method for LTBI. Compared with the interferon γ release test assays (IGRAs), the diagnostic performance of EC-Test to LTBI screening in HIV needs to be evaluated.
METHODS: A population-based multicenter prospective study was conducted in Guangxi Province, China. The baseline data was collected and LTBI were measured by QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT), EC-Test and T-cell spot of the TB assay (T-SPOT.TB).
RESULTS: A total of 1478 patients were enrolled. when taking T-SPOT.TB as reference, the value of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and consistency that EC-Test to diagnosis LTBI in HIV is 40.42%, 97.98%, 85.26%, 85.04% and 85.06% respectively; when taking QFT-GIT as reference, the value is 36.00%, 92.57%, 55.10%, 85.09% and 81.13%, respectively. When the CD4+ <200 /μl, the accuracy of EC-Test to T-SPOT.TB and QFT-GIT were 87.12% and 88.89%, respectively; when the 200 ≤ CD4+ ≤ 500 /μl, the accuracy of EC-Test were 86.20% and 83.18%, respectively; when the CD4+ >500/μl, the accuracy of EC-Test were 84.29% and 77.94%, respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions in EC-Test is 34.23% and the serious adverse reactions is 1.15%.
CONCLUSION: EC-Test has good consistency compared with IGRAs in detecting LTBI in HIV no matter in different immunosuppression status or different regions, and the safety of EC-Test is also well, suitable for LTBI screening in HIV in high prevalence settings.
METHODS: A population-based multicenter prospective study was conducted in Guangxi Province, China. The baseline data was collected and LTBI were measured by QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT), EC-Test and T-cell spot of the TB assay (T-SPOT.TB).
RESULTS: A total of 1478 patients were enrolled. when taking T-SPOT.TB as reference, the value of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and consistency that EC-Test to diagnosis LTBI in HIV is 40.42%, 97.98%, 85.26%, 85.04% and 85.06% respectively; when taking QFT-GIT as reference, the value is 36.00%, 92.57%, 55.10%, 85.09% and 81.13%, respectively. When the CD4+ <200 /μl, the accuracy of EC-Test to T-SPOT.TB and QFT-GIT were 87.12% and 88.89%, respectively; when the 200 ≤ CD4+ ≤ 500 /μl, the accuracy of EC-Test were 86.20% and 83.18%, respectively; when the CD4+ >500/μl, the accuracy of EC-Test were 84.29% and 77.94%, respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions in EC-Test is 34.23% and the serious adverse reactions is 1.15%.
CONCLUSION: EC-Test has good consistency compared with IGRAs in detecting LTBI in HIV no matter in different immunosuppression status or different regions, and the safety of EC-Test is also well, suitable for LTBI screening in HIV in high prevalence settings.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Abdominal wall closure.British Journal of Surgery 2023 September 16
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app