We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Observational Study
Tolerance to Induced Astigmatism With a Monofocal Intraocular Lens Designed to Extend the Depth of Focus.
Journal of Refractive Surgery 2023 April
PURPOSE: To determine tolerance to residual astigmatism and visual performance in eyes implanted with a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) designed to extend the depth of focus (Tecnis Eyhance, DIB00; Johnson & Johnson Vision) compared to eyes implanted with a standard monofocal IOL (Tecnis ZCB00; Johnson & Johnson Vision).
METHODS: This prospective, observational study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent routine cataract surgery and implantation of either the DIB00 (n = 20) or ZCB00 (n = 20) IOL. Astigmatic defocus was induced with a plus cylinder from +0.50 to +2.00 diopters (D) in 0.50-D steps for each astigmatic orientation (against-the-rule [ATR], with-the-rule [WTR], and oblique). Outcome measures included the comparison of mean visual acuity at each step of defocus, astigmatic defocus curves, and near and intermediate visual acuity.
RESULTS: Eyes implanted with the DIB00 demonstrated greater astigmatic tolerance and were more likely to maintain 20/40 or better visual acuity with up to +2.00 D of induced ATR and oblique astigmatism than the ZCB00 IOLs. The DIB00 group showed 1.3 lines better visual acuity at 2.00 D of ATR astigmatic defocus and 1 line better than the ZCB00 group at 1.50 D of oblique astigmatic defocus. Although the distance visual acuity was comparable, near and intermediate visual acuities (both distance-corrected and uncorrected) were better for the DIB00 IOL than for the standard ZCB00 IOL.
CONCLUSIONS: The monofocal IOL designed to extend the depth of focus (DIB00 group) showed greater tolerance to induced astigmatism in ATR and oblique orientations and superior uncorrected and distance-corrected near and intermediate visual acuity than the standard monofocal IOL of the same IOL platform. [ J Refract Surg . 2023;39(4):222-228.] .
METHODS: This prospective, observational study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent routine cataract surgery and implantation of either the DIB00 (n = 20) or ZCB00 (n = 20) IOL. Astigmatic defocus was induced with a plus cylinder from +0.50 to +2.00 diopters (D) in 0.50-D steps for each astigmatic orientation (against-the-rule [ATR], with-the-rule [WTR], and oblique). Outcome measures included the comparison of mean visual acuity at each step of defocus, astigmatic defocus curves, and near and intermediate visual acuity.
RESULTS: Eyes implanted with the DIB00 demonstrated greater astigmatic tolerance and were more likely to maintain 20/40 or better visual acuity with up to +2.00 D of induced ATR and oblique astigmatism than the ZCB00 IOLs. The DIB00 group showed 1.3 lines better visual acuity at 2.00 D of ATR astigmatic defocus and 1 line better than the ZCB00 group at 1.50 D of oblique astigmatic defocus. Although the distance visual acuity was comparable, near and intermediate visual acuities (both distance-corrected and uncorrected) were better for the DIB00 IOL than for the standard ZCB00 IOL.
CONCLUSIONS: The monofocal IOL designed to extend the depth of focus (DIB00 group) showed greater tolerance to induced astigmatism in ATR and oblique orientations and superior uncorrected and distance-corrected near and intermediate visual acuity than the standard monofocal IOL of the same IOL platform. [ J Refract Surg . 2023;39(4):222-228.] .
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Prevention and management of venous thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis.British Journal of Haematology 2024 August 26
Arrhythmogenic Mitral Valve Prolapse: Can We Risk Stratify and Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death?Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review 2024
Antibodies in Autoimmune Neuropathies: What to Test, How to Test, Why to Test.Neurology 2024 August 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app