We have located links that may give you full text access.
Food insecurity screening in primary care: Patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic by encounter modality.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2023 March 23
INTRODUCTION: Screening for food insecurity in clinical settings is recommended, but implementation varies widely. This study evaluated the prevalence of screening for food insecurity and other social risks in telehealth versus in-person encounters during the COVID-19 pandemic, and changes in screening before versus after widespread COVID vaccine availability.
METHODS: These cross-sectional analyses used electronic health record (EHR) and ancillary clinic data from a national network of 400+ community health centers with a shared EHR. Food insecurity screening was characterized in 2022 in a sample of 275,465 first encounters for routine primary care at any network clinic during March 11, 2020-December 31, 2021. An adjusted multivariate multi-level probit model estimated screening prevalence based on encounter mode (in-person versus telehealth) and time period (initial pandemic versus after vaccine availability), in a random subsample of 11,000 encounters.
RESULTS: Encounter mode was related to food insecurity screening (p<0.0001), with an estimated 9.2% screening rate during in-person encounters, compared to 5.1% at telehealth encounters. There was an interaction between time period and encounter mode (p<0.0001), with higher screening at in-person vs. telehealth encounters after COVID-19 vaccines were available (11.7% v. 4.9%) versus before vaccines were available (7.8% v. 5.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Food insecurity screening in first primary care encounters is low overall, with lower rates during telehealth visits and the earlier phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should explore methods for enhancing social risk screening in telehealth encounters.
METHODS: These cross-sectional analyses used electronic health record (EHR) and ancillary clinic data from a national network of 400+ community health centers with a shared EHR. Food insecurity screening was characterized in 2022 in a sample of 275,465 first encounters for routine primary care at any network clinic during March 11, 2020-December 31, 2021. An adjusted multivariate multi-level probit model estimated screening prevalence based on encounter mode (in-person versus telehealth) and time period (initial pandemic versus after vaccine availability), in a random subsample of 11,000 encounters.
RESULTS: Encounter mode was related to food insecurity screening (p<0.0001), with an estimated 9.2% screening rate during in-person encounters, compared to 5.1% at telehealth encounters. There was an interaction between time period and encounter mode (p<0.0001), with higher screening at in-person vs. telehealth encounters after COVID-19 vaccines were available (11.7% v. 4.9%) versus before vaccines were available (7.8% v. 5.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Food insecurity screening in first primary care encounters is low overall, with lower rates during telehealth visits and the earlier phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should explore methods for enhancing social risk screening in telehealth encounters.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app