Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Enhanced extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal by acidification and metabolic control.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO<inf>2</inf>R) promotes protective ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure, but devices with high CO<inf>2</inf> extraction capacity are required for clinically relevant impact. This study evaluates three novel low-flow techniques based on dialysate acidification, also combined with renal replacement therapy, and metabolic control.

METHODS: Eight swine were connected to a low-flow (350 mL/min) extracorporeal circuit including a dialyzer with a closed-loop dialysate circuit, and two membrane lungs on blood (ML<inf>b</inf>) and dialysate (ML<inf>d</inf>), respectively. The following 2-hour steps were performed: 1) ML<inf>b</inf>-start (ML<inf>b</inf> ventilated); 2) ML<inf>bd</inf>-start (ML<inf>b</inf> and ML<inf>d</inf> ventilated); 3) HLac (lactic acid infusion before ML<inf>d</inf>); 4) HCl-NaLac (hydrochloric acid infusion before ML<inf>d</inf> combined with renal replacement therapy and reinfusion of sodium lactate); 5) HCl-βHB-NaLac (hydrochloric acid infusion before ML<inf>d</inf> combined with renal replacement therapy and reinfusion of sodium lactate and sodium 3-hydroxybutyrate). Caloric and fluid inputs, temperature, blood glucose and arterial carbon dioxide pressure were kept constant.

RESULTS: The total MLs CO<inf>2</inf> removal in HLac (130±25 mL/min), HCl-NaLac (130±21 mL/min) and HCl-βHB-NaLac (124±18 mL/min) were higher compared with ML<inf>bd</inf>-start (81±15 mL/min, P<0.05) and ML<inf>b</inf>-start (55±7 mL/min, P<0.05). Minute ventilation in HLac (4.3±0.9 L/min), HCl-NaLac (3.6±0.8 L/min) and HCl-βHB-NaLac (3.6±0.8 L/min) were lower compared to ML<inf>b</inf>-start (6.2±1.1 L/min, P<0.05) and ML<inf>bd</inf>-start (5.8±2.1 L/min, P<0.05). Arterial pH was 7.40±0.03 at ML<inf>b</inf>-start and decreased only during HCl-βHB-NaLac (7.35±0.03, P<0.05). No relevant changes in electrolyte concentrations, hemodynamics and significant adverse events were detected.

CONCLUSIONS: The three techniques achieved a significant extracorporeal CO<inf>2</inf> removal allowing a relevant reduction in minute ventilation with a sufficient safety profile.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app