We have located links that may give you full text access.
Morphometric assessment of the ciliary body in patients with Marfan syndrome and ectopia lentis: A quantitative study using ultrasound biomicroscopy: Ciliary body morphology in Marfan syndrome and ectopia lentis.
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2023 March 21
PURPOSE: To explore the biometric characteristics of the ciliary body in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) and ectopia lentis (EL).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive MFS patients with EL and 72 non-disease controls were recruited. Ciliary body biometric parameters such as ciliary muscle cross-sectional area at 2000 μm from the scleral spur (CMA2000), ciliary muscle thickness at 1000 μm from the scleral spur (CMT1000), and maximum ciliary body thickness (CBTmax) were measured from multiple directions with ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). The relationship between ciliary body parameters and other ocular characteristics was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Average CMA2000, CMT1000, and CBTmax were 0.692 ± 0.015 mm2 , 0.405 ± 0.010 mm, and 0.855±0.023 mm in MFS eyes, respectively, and were significantly smaller than controls (all p < 0.001). The prevalence of ciliary body thinning was 22.2% in the MFS group versus 0 in controls (p < 0.001); eyes with more severe EL had smaller CMA2000 (p = 0.050), thinner CMT1000 (p = 0.022) and shorter CBTmax (p = 0.015). Patients with microspherophakia (MSP) had even smaller CMA2000 (p = 0.033) and CMT1000 (p = 0.044) than those without MSP. The most common subluxation direction was in the superonasal quadrant (25, 39.7%), which probably correlates with the thinnest CMT1000 in the inferotemporal quadrant (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: MFS patients with EL had thinner ciliary muscles, shorter ciliary processes, and a higher prevalence of ciliary body thinning, especially those with MSP. Both the extent and direction of subluxation were associated with ciliary body biometry.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive MFS patients with EL and 72 non-disease controls were recruited. Ciliary body biometric parameters such as ciliary muscle cross-sectional area at 2000 μm from the scleral spur (CMA2000), ciliary muscle thickness at 1000 μm from the scleral spur (CMT1000), and maximum ciliary body thickness (CBTmax) were measured from multiple directions with ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). The relationship between ciliary body parameters and other ocular characteristics was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Average CMA2000, CMT1000, and CBTmax were 0.692 ± 0.015 mm2 , 0.405 ± 0.010 mm, and 0.855±0.023 mm in MFS eyes, respectively, and were significantly smaller than controls (all p < 0.001). The prevalence of ciliary body thinning was 22.2% in the MFS group versus 0 in controls (p < 0.001); eyes with more severe EL had smaller CMA2000 (p = 0.050), thinner CMT1000 (p = 0.022) and shorter CBTmax (p = 0.015). Patients with microspherophakia (MSP) had even smaller CMA2000 (p = 0.033) and CMT1000 (p = 0.044) than those without MSP. The most common subluxation direction was in the superonasal quadrant (25, 39.7%), which probably correlates with the thinnest CMT1000 in the inferotemporal quadrant (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: MFS patients with EL had thinner ciliary muscles, shorter ciliary processes, and a higher prevalence of ciliary body thinning, especially those with MSP. Both the extent and direction of subluxation were associated with ciliary body biometry.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app