JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
REVIEW
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Angiographic factors leading to hemorrhage in AVMs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Neurosurgical Review 2023 March 21
For patients with unruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), the risk of a hemorrhagic event is approximately 2% to 4% annually. These events have an associated 20-50% morbidity and 10% mortality rate. An understanding of risk factors that predispose these lesions to rupture is important for optimal management. We aimed to pool a large cohort of both ruptured and unruptured AVMs from the literature with the goal of identifying angiographic risk factors that contribute to rupture. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines using Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Studies that presented patient-level data from ruptured AVMs from January 1990 to January 2022 were considered for inclusion. The initial screening of 8,304 papers resulted in a quantitative analysis of 25 papers, which identified six angiographic risk factors for AVM rupture. Characteristics that significantly increase the odds of rupture include the presence of aneurysm (OR = 1.45 [1.19, 1.77], p < 0.001, deep location (OR = 3.08 [2.56, 3.70], p < 0.001), infratentorial location (OR = 2.79 [2.08, 3.75], p < 0.001), exclusive deep venous drainage (OR = 2.50 [1.73, 3.61], p < 0.001), single venous drainage (OR = 2.97 [1.93, 4.56], p < 0.001), and nidus size less than 3 cm (OR = 2.54 [1.41, 4.57], p = 0.002). Although previous literature has provided insight into AVM rupture risk factors, obscurity still exists regarding which risk factors pose the greatest risk. We have identified six major angiographic risk factors (presence of an aneurysm, deep location, infratentorial location, exclusive deep venous drainage, single venous drainage, and nidus size less than 3 cm) that, when identified by a clinician, may help to tailor patient-specific approaches and guide clinical decisions.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app