Trunk stability in fatiguing frequency-dependent lifting activities.
Gait & Posture 2023 March 8
BACKGROUND: Work-related low-back disorders (WLBDs) are one of the most frequent and costly musculoskeletal conditions. It has been showed that WLBDs may occur when intervertebral or torso equilibrium is altered by a biomechanical perturbations or neuromuscular control error. The capacity to react to such disturbances is heavily determined by the spinal stability, provided by active and passive tissues and controlled by the central nervous system.
RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aims to investigate trunk stability through the Lyapunov's maximum exponent during repetitive liftings in relation to risk level, as well as to evaluate its ability to discriminate these risk levels.
METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers performed fatiguing lifting tasks at three different frequencies corresponding to low, medium, and high risk levels according to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) equation. We investigated changes in spinal stability during fatiguing lifting tasks at different risk levels using the maximum Lyapunov's index (λMax ) computed from trunk accelerations recorded by placing three IMUs at pelvis, lower and upper spine levels. A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to determine if there was any significant effect on λMax among the three risk levels and the time (start, mid, and end of the task). Additionally, we examined the Pearson's correlation of λMax with the trunk muscle co-activation, computed from trunk sEMG.
RESULTS: Our findings show an increase in trunk stability with increasing risk level and as the lifting task progressed over time. A negative correlation between λMax and trunk co-activation was observed which illustrates that the increase in spinal stability could be partially attributed to increased trunk muscle co-activation.
SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights the possibility of generating stability measures from kinematic data as risk assessment features in fatiguing tasks which may prove useful to detect the risk of developing work-related low back pain disorders and allow the implementation of early ergonomic interventions.
RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aims to investigate trunk stability through the Lyapunov's maximum exponent during repetitive liftings in relation to risk level, as well as to evaluate its ability to discriminate these risk levels.
METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers performed fatiguing lifting tasks at three different frequencies corresponding to low, medium, and high risk levels according to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) equation. We investigated changes in spinal stability during fatiguing lifting tasks at different risk levels using the maximum Lyapunov's index (λMax ) computed from trunk accelerations recorded by placing three IMUs at pelvis, lower and upper spine levels. A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to determine if there was any significant effect on λMax among the three risk levels and the time (start, mid, and end of the task). Additionally, we examined the Pearson's correlation of λMax with the trunk muscle co-activation, computed from trunk sEMG.
RESULTS: Our findings show an increase in trunk stability with increasing risk level and as the lifting task progressed over time. A negative correlation between λMax and trunk co-activation was observed which illustrates that the increase in spinal stability could be partially attributed to increased trunk muscle co-activation.
SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights the possibility of generating stability measures from kinematic data as risk assessment features in fatiguing tasks which may prove useful to detect the risk of developing work-related low back pain disorders and allow the implementation of early ergonomic interventions.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app