We have located links that may give you full text access.
Role of [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET radiomics to predict post-surgical ISUP grade in primary prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the role of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET radiomics for the prediction of post-surgical International Society of Urological Pathology (PS ISUP) grade in primary prostate cancer (PCa).
METHODS: This retrospective study included 47 PCa patients who underwent [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET at IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute before radical prostatectomy. The whole prostate was manually contoured on PET images and 103 image biomarker standardization initiative (IBSI)-compliant radiomic features (RFs) were extracted. Features were then selected using the minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm and a combination of the 4 most relevant RFs was used to train 12 radiomics machine learning models for the prediction of PS ISUP grade: ISUP ≥ 4 vs ISUP < 4. Machine learning models were validated by means of fivefold repeated cross-validation, and two control models were generated to assess that our findings were not surrogates of spurious associations. Balanced accuracy (bACC) was collected for all generated models and compared with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were also reported to provide a complete overview of models' performance. The predictions of the best performing model were compared against ISUP grade at biopsy.
RESULTS: ISUP grade at biopsy was upgraded in 9/47 patients after prostatectomy, resulting in a bACC = 85.9%, SN = 71.9%, SP = 100%, PPV = 100%, and NPV = 62.5%, while the best-performing radiomic model yielded a bACC = 87.6%, SN = 88.6%, SP = 86.7%, PPV = 94%, and NPV = 82.5%. All radiomic models trained with at least 2 RFs (GLSZM-Zone Entropy and Shape-Least Axis Length) outperformed the control models. Conversely, no significant differences were found for radiomic models trained with 2 or more RFs (Mann-Whitney p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: These findings support the role of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET radiomics for the accurate and non-invasive prediction of PS ISUP grade.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 47 PCa patients who underwent [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET at IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute before radical prostatectomy. The whole prostate was manually contoured on PET images and 103 image biomarker standardization initiative (IBSI)-compliant radiomic features (RFs) were extracted. Features were then selected using the minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm and a combination of the 4 most relevant RFs was used to train 12 radiomics machine learning models for the prediction of PS ISUP grade: ISUP ≥ 4 vs ISUP < 4. Machine learning models were validated by means of fivefold repeated cross-validation, and two control models were generated to assess that our findings were not surrogates of spurious associations. Balanced accuracy (bACC) was collected for all generated models and compared with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were also reported to provide a complete overview of models' performance. The predictions of the best performing model were compared against ISUP grade at biopsy.
RESULTS: ISUP grade at biopsy was upgraded in 9/47 patients after prostatectomy, resulting in a bACC = 85.9%, SN = 71.9%, SP = 100%, PPV = 100%, and NPV = 62.5%, while the best-performing radiomic model yielded a bACC = 87.6%, SN = 88.6%, SP = 86.7%, PPV = 94%, and NPV = 82.5%. All radiomic models trained with at least 2 RFs (GLSZM-Zone Entropy and Shape-Least Axis Length) outperformed the control models. Conversely, no significant differences were found for radiomic models trained with 2 or more RFs (Mann-Whitney p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: These findings support the role of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET radiomics for the accurate and non-invasive prediction of PS ISUP grade.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app