Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Initial Feasibility and Acute Toxicity Outcomes from a Phase II trial of FDG-PET response-based de-escalated definitive chemoradiotherapy for p16+ oropharynx cancer, a Planned Interim Analysis.

PURPOSE: 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) parameters are prognostic of oncologic outcomes in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). We utilized FDG-PET imaging biomarkers to select patients for de-escalated chemoradiotherapy (CRT) hypothesizing that acute toxicity will be improved with de-escalation.

METHODS: This is a planned interim initial feasibility and acute toxicity report from a phase II prospective, non-randomized study which enrolled patients with stage I-II p16+ OPSCC. All patients started definitive CRT to 70 Gy in 35 fractions, and those that met de-escalation criteria on mid-treatment FDG-PET at fraction 10 completed treatment at 54 Gy in 27 fractions. We report the acute toxicity and patient reported outcomes on 59 patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 months.

RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between baseline patient characteristics in the standard and de-escalated cohorts. There were 28/59 (47.5%) patients who met FDG-PET de-escalation criteria and collectively received 20-30% less dose to critical organs at risk known to affect toxicity. At 3 months post-treatment, patients who received de-escalated CRT lost significantly less weight (median 5.8% vs 13.0%, p<0.001), had significantly less change from baseline in Penetration-Aspiration Scale score (median 0 vs 1, p=0.018), and had significantly fewer aspiration events on repeat swallow study (8.0% vs 33.3%, p=0.037) as compared to patients receiving standard CRT.

CONCLUSION: Approximately half of early-stage p16+ OPSCC patients are selected for de-escalation of definitive CRT using mid-treatment FDG-PET biomarkers, which resulted in significantly improved rates of observed acute toxicity. Further follow up is ongoing and will be required to determine if this de-escalation approach preserves the favorable oncologic outcomes for p16+ OPSCC patients before adoption.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app