We have located links that may give you full text access.
Knowledge, attitude, and practices of operating theatre staff towards environmentally sustainable practices in the operating theatres.
Pediatric Surgery International 2023 March 18
BACKGROUND: Successful implementation of environmentally sustainable practices in the operating theatre (OT) requires stakeholder engagement. We evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of OT users in our institution towards sustainable practices in the OT.
METHODS: A survey was conducted among OT users in August 2022. Respondents completed a 44-question anonymised online survey covering sustainability in (1) knowledge, (2) attitude, (3) practice, and (4) proposed changes to current practices. Points were assigned to knowledge (15 points) and attitude (40 points) sections. Practice was evaluated based on proportion of measures practiced. Appropriate statistical tests were used, with significance p < 0.05. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or proportion (%).
RESULTS: Among 149 respondents were doctors (n = 76), non-doctors (n = 45), and medical students (n = 28). Doctors scored highest in knowledge of sustainability (8.58 ± 1.83) compared to non-doctors and medical students (7.62 ± 1.75, 8.39 ± 1.87). Positive attitudes towards sustainability correlated with years of experience (p < 0.01). Non-doctors were more likely to practice sustainable measures, versus doctors (61 vs 52%, p < 0.01). Most (69%) respondents were unwilling to adopt any practice changes. The least popular measure was replacement of standard hand scrubbing with alcohol-based hand rub, considered unsafe by 74% of respondents.
CONCLUSION: Despite positive attitudes towards sustainable measures, there remains wariness of practice changes, which should be addressed by educational campaigns.
METHODS: A survey was conducted among OT users in August 2022. Respondents completed a 44-question anonymised online survey covering sustainability in (1) knowledge, (2) attitude, (3) practice, and (4) proposed changes to current practices. Points were assigned to knowledge (15 points) and attitude (40 points) sections. Practice was evaluated based on proportion of measures practiced. Appropriate statistical tests were used, with significance p < 0.05. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or proportion (%).
RESULTS: Among 149 respondents were doctors (n = 76), non-doctors (n = 45), and medical students (n = 28). Doctors scored highest in knowledge of sustainability (8.58 ± 1.83) compared to non-doctors and medical students (7.62 ± 1.75, 8.39 ± 1.87). Positive attitudes towards sustainability correlated with years of experience (p < 0.01). Non-doctors were more likely to practice sustainable measures, versus doctors (61 vs 52%, p < 0.01). Most (69%) respondents were unwilling to adopt any practice changes. The least popular measure was replacement of standard hand scrubbing with alcohol-based hand rub, considered unsafe by 74% of respondents.
CONCLUSION: Despite positive attitudes towards sustainable measures, there remains wariness of practice changes, which should be addressed by educational campaigns.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app