We have located links that may give you full text access.
Pre-literacy assessment in children living with HIV in Tanzania: comparison to results from children living without HIV in Tanzania and the US.
AIDS 2023 March 7
OBJECTIVE: Children with HIV (CWH) are at increased risk for cognitive and developmental delays. Whether HIV affects literacy development, however, remains unknown. Rapid automatized naming (RAN) tasks offer the simplest preliteracy assessment a child can perform that predicts future reading skills across languages.
DESIGN AND METHODS: RAN performance was analyzed cross-sectionally on 473 children (249 children without HIV and 217 CWH; ages 3-9) drawn from a longitudinal study in Tanzania. These data were compared to results from 341 normally developing children without HIV (ages 3-8) from the United States. Participants performed two RAN subtests: colors and objects.
RESULTS: RAN object completion was greater than for the RAN color in Tanzanian children. CWH were less likely to complete either subtest and performed worse on the object subtest compared to Tanzanian children without HIV. Compared to the US cohort, the Tanzanian cohort was less likely to complete both subtests - in particular the colors subtest - and showed more variability in responses at younger ages. After approximately age 6, however, the trajectory of improvement between the United States and Tanzania was similar.
CONCLUSIONS: CWH performed worse on this per-literacy test, indicating literacy skill development in CWH needs further study. The differences between US and Tanzanian results likely reflect variability in when children learn to name colors and objects. The trajectory of improvement between countries became more similar as the children aged. This study motivates further longitudinal analyses aimed at assessing the developmental trajectory of the RAN, its predictive ability for reading skills, and its link with other preliteracy and cognitive skills.
DESIGN AND METHODS: RAN performance was analyzed cross-sectionally on 473 children (249 children without HIV and 217 CWH; ages 3-9) drawn from a longitudinal study in Tanzania. These data were compared to results from 341 normally developing children without HIV (ages 3-8) from the United States. Participants performed two RAN subtests: colors and objects.
RESULTS: RAN object completion was greater than for the RAN color in Tanzanian children. CWH were less likely to complete either subtest and performed worse on the object subtest compared to Tanzanian children without HIV. Compared to the US cohort, the Tanzanian cohort was less likely to complete both subtests - in particular the colors subtest - and showed more variability in responses at younger ages. After approximately age 6, however, the trajectory of improvement between the United States and Tanzania was similar.
CONCLUSIONS: CWH performed worse on this per-literacy test, indicating literacy skill development in CWH needs further study. The differences between US and Tanzanian results likely reflect variability in when children learn to name colors and objects. The trajectory of improvement between countries became more similar as the children aged. This study motivates further longitudinal analyses aimed at assessing the developmental trajectory of the RAN, its predictive ability for reading skills, and its link with other preliteracy and cognitive skills.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app