We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Long-term atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in patients with cancer: a population-based study.
Current Problems in Cardiology 2023 March 16
BACKGROUND: The long-term risk of incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) among cancer patients remains incompletely defined. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term ASCVD risk in cancer patients compared with the non-cancer population.
METHODS: This was a prospective population-based study using data from the Kailuan cohort, 6,204 individuals with newly diagnosed cancer, free of ASCVD, were matched in a 1:1 ratio to non-cancer controls for age (±1) and sex, from June 2006 to December 2020. Multivariable competing risk analyses were performed to evaluate the association between cancer diagnosis and risk of incident ASCVD events (including myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure, and revascularization with coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention).
RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 5.3 (1.7, 9.7) years, 1,019 incident ASCVD events were observed. Compared to participants without cancer, there was a similar risk for incident ASCVD events among cancer patients within the first few years after cancer diagnosis, and the risk declined over time. Overall, cancer patients showed lower risks of incident ASCVD compared to the non-cancer patients over the long term, with a hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.52 (0.45-0.60) for composite ASCVD events, 0.43 (0.35-0.53) for ischemic stroke, 0.63 (0.42-0.95) for myocardial infarction, 0.63 (0.48-0.83) for heart failure, and 0.82 (0.60-1.11) for coronary revascularization. Baseline level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, blood pressure, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein could independently predict the incident ASCVD among the study population. Subgroup analyses according to cancer types revealed a significantly lower risk of ASCVD events among patients with digestive cancer or respiratory cancer compared with non-cancer controls, but not for urologic or genital cancer. Multiple sensitivity analyses yielded similar results to the primary analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term ASCVD risk among cancer survivors is not increased compared with the non-cancer individuals, probably driven by a favorable profile of baseline risk factor in cancer population.
METHODS: This was a prospective population-based study using data from the Kailuan cohort, 6,204 individuals with newly diagnosed cancer, free of ASCVD, were matched in a 1:1 ratio to non-cancer controls for age (±1) and sex, from June 2006 to December 2020. Multivariable competing risk analyses were performed to evaluate the association between cancer diagnosis and risk of incident ASCVD events (including myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure, and revascularization with coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention).
RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 5.3 (1.7, 9.7) years, 1,019 incident ASCVD events were observed. Compared to participants without cancer, there was a similar risk for incident ASCVD events among cancer patients within the first few years after cancer diagnosis, and the risk declined over time. Overall, cancer patients showed lower risks of incident ASCVD compared to the non-cancer patients over the long term, with a hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.52 (0.45-0.60) for composite ASCVD events, 0.43 (0.35-0.53) for ischemic stroke, 0.63 (0.42-0.95) for myocardial infarction, 0.63 (0.48-0.83) for heart failure, and 0.82 (0.60-1.11) for coronary revascularization. Baseline level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, blood pressure, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein could independently predict the incident ASCVD among the study population. Subgroup analyses according to cancer types revealed a significantly lower risk of ASCVD events among patients with digestive cancer or respiratory cancer compared with non-cancer controls, but not for urologic or genital cancer. Multiple sensitivity analyses yielded similar results to the primary analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term ASCVD risk among cancer survivors is not increased compared with the non-cancer individuals, probably driven by a favorable profile of baseline risk factor in cancer population.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app