Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Changes in Surgical Outcomes in a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative with Introduction of Simultaneous, Comprehensive Interventions.

BACKGROUND: Surgical quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) aim to improve patient outcomes through coaching, benchmarked data reporting, and other activities. While other regional QICs have formed organically over time, it is unknown whether a comprehensive QI program implemented simultaneously across hospitals at the formation of a QIC would improve patient outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing surgery at 48 hospitals in the Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) were included. Risk-adjusted rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality were compared from baseline to Year 3. Difference-in-differences analyses compared ISQIC hospitals to hospitals in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File (PUF), which served as a control.

RESULTS: There were 180,582 patients who underwent surgery at ISQIC-participating hospitals. Inpatient procedures comprised 100,219 (55.5%) cases. By Year 3, risk-adjusted rates of death or serious morbidity decreased in both ISQIC (relative reduction 25.0%, p<0.001) and PUF hospitals (7.8%, p<0.001). Adjusted difference-in-differences analysis revealed that ISQIC-participation was associated with a significantly greater reduction in death or serious morbidity (odds ratio (OR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-0.99, p=0.01) compared to PUF hospitals. Relative reductions in risk-adjusted rates of other outcomes were also seen in both ISQIC and PUF hospitals (Morbidity 22.4% vs 6.4%; Venous Thromboembolism 20.0% vs 5.0%; Superficial Surgical Site Infection 27.3% vs 7.7%, all p<0.05), though these difference-in-differences did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION: While complication rates decreased at both ISQIC and PUF hospitals, participation in ISQIC was associated with a significantly greater improvement in death or serious morbidity. These results underscore the potential of QICs to improve patient outcomes.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app