We have located links that may give you full text access.
Histopathological Helsinki score of colorectal liver metastases predicts survival after liver resection.
AIM: Several perioperative scoring systems have been created to predict outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer; however, these rarely include histological parameters. We evaluated histological factors used for patients with liver metastases operated between 2000 and 2019 and compared the results with the Fong score.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Many scoring models for overall disease-free survival (DFS) were established and compared using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Statistically significant predictors at a 5% level in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate models using the backward and forward selection methods. Per these models, we established a score of eight histological factors. We defined low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups and compared them using the Kaplan-Meier survival and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses. The histological score's accuracy was compared with the modified Fong clinical risk score.
RESULTS: The following factors constituted the Helsinki score: advanced pT stage, node-positive primary, ≥2 metastases, size >50 mm, vitality >30%, margin <5 mm, vascular invasion, and biliary invasion. The high-risk group had significantly worse DFS and overall survival. In ROC analyses, the Helsinki score was slightly better than the modified Fong clinical risk score.
CONCLUSIONS: Helsinki score challenges physicians to acknowledge histological factors as important outcome measures.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Many scoring models for overall disease-free survival (DFS) were established and compared using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Statistically significant predictors at a 5% level in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate models using the backward and forward selection methods. Per these models, we established a score of eight histological factors. We defined low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups and compared them using the Kaplan-Meier survival and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses. The histological score's accuracy was compared with the modified Fong clinical risk score.
RESULTS: The following factors constituted the Helsinki score: advanced pT stage, node-positive primary, ≥2 metastases, size >50 mm, vitality >30%, margin <5 mm, vascular invasion, and biliary invasion. The high-risk group had significantly worse DFS and overall survival. In ROC analyses, the Helsinki score was slightly better than the modified Fong clinical risk score.
CONCLUSIONS: Helsinki score challenges physicians to acknowledge histological factors as important outcome measures.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app