Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Use of the quantitative antibiogram method for assessing nosocomial transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a French hospital.

BACKGROUND: ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (eESBL) have a high prevalence in hospitals but real-time monitoring of nosocomial acquisition through conventional typing methods is challenging. Moreover, patient-to-patient transmission varies between the main species, namely Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, then questioning the relevance of applying identical preventive measures.

AIM: To detect eESBL cross-transmission events (CTE) using combination of quantitative antibiogram with epidemiological data (combined-QA), and to rule on the effectiveness of standard or contact precautions for eESBL species.

METHODS: First, a validation set was used to confirm the relevance of the combined-QA by comparison to a combination of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and epidemiological data (combined-PFGE). Secondly, a four-year retrospective analysis was conducted to detect eESBL-CTE in hospitalized patients. Two species were screened i.e. ESBL-E. coli (ESBL-Ec), and ESBL-K. pneumoniae (ESBL-Kp). During the study, only standard precautions were applied to ESBL-Ec patients whereas contact precautions were retained for ESBL-Kp.

FINDINGS: As a proof of concept, results between the two combined methods for the detection of CTE were identical for E. coli, and similar to at least 75% for K. pneumoniae. During the retrospective analysis, 722 patients with ESBL-Ec isolates and 280 with ESBL-Kp isolates were included. Nine CTE were identified for E. coli and 23 for K. pneumoniae, implying 20 (2.7%) and 36 (12.8%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The QA-combined method constitutes a rapid tool for epidemiological surveillance to detect CTE. In our hospital, standard precautions are sufficient to prevent acquisition of ESBL-Ec whereas contact precautions must be implemented to prevent acquisition of ESBL-Kp.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app