Comparison of lesion characteristics using temperature-flow-controlled versus conventional power-controlled ablation with fixed ablation index.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 2023 March 12
PURPOSE: The QDOT-MicroTM catheter is a novel irrigated contact force (CF) sensing catheter which benefits from thermocouples for temperature monitoring, allowing temperature-flow-controlled (TFC) ablation. We compared lesion metrics at fixed ablation index (AI) value during TFC-ablation and conventional power-controlled (PC)-ablation.
METHODS: A total of 480 RF-applications were performed on ex-vivo swine myocardium with predefined AI targets (400/550) or until steam-pop occurred, using the QDOT-MicroTM (TFC-ablation) and Thermocool SmartTouch SFTM (PC-ablation).
RESULTS: Both TFC-ablation and PC-ablation produced similar lesions in volume (218±116 vs 212±107 mm3 , p=0.65); however, lesions using TFC-ablation were larger in surface area (41.3±8.8 vs 34.8±8.0 mm2 , p<0.001) and shallower in depth (4.0±1.0 vs 4.2±1.1 mm, p=0.044). Average power tended to be lower in TFC-alation (34.2±8.6 vs 36.9±9.2, p=0.005) compared to PC-ablation due to automatic regulation of temperature and irrigation-flow. Although steam-pops were less frequent in TFC-ablation (24% vs 15%, p=0.021), they were particularly observed in low-CF (10g) and high-power ablation (50W) in both PC-ablation (n=24/240, 10.0%) and TFC-ablation (n=23/240, 9.6%). Multivariate analysis revealed that high-power, low-CF, long application time, perpendicular catheter orientation, and PC-ablation were risk factors for steam-pops. Furthermore, activation of automatic regulation of temperature and irrigation-flow was independently associated with high-CF and long application time while ablation power had no significant relationship.
CONCLUSIONS: With a fixed target AI, TFC-ablation reduced the risk of steam-pops, producing similar lesions in volume, but with different metrics in this ex-vivo study. However, lower CF and higher power in fixed-AI ablation may increase the risk of steam-pops. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
METHODS: A total of 480 RF-applications were performed on ex-vivo swine myocardium with predefined AI targets (400/550) or until steam-pop occurred, using the QDOT-MicroTM (TFC-ablation) and Thermocool SmartTouch SFTM (PC-ablation).
RESULTS: Both TFC-ablation and PC-ablation produced similar lesions in volume (218±116 vs 212±107 mm3 , p=0.65); however, lesions using TFC-ablation were larger in surface area (41.3±8.8 vs 34.8±8.0 mm2 , p<0.001) and shallower in depth (4.0±1.0 vs 4.2±1.1 mm, p=0.044). Average power tended to be lower in TFC-alation (34.2±8.6 vs 36.9±9.2, p=0.005) compared to PC-ablation due to automatic regulation of temperature and irrigation-flow. Although steam-pops were less frequent in TFC-ablation (24% vs 15%, p=0.021), they were particularly observed in low-CF (10g) and high-power ablation (50W) in both PC-ablation (n=24/240, 10.0%) and TFC-ablation (n=23/240, 9.6%). Multivariate analysis revealed that high-power, low-CF, long application time, perpendicular catheter orientation, and PC-ablation were risk factors for steam-pops. Furthermore, activation of automatic regulation of temperature and irrigation-flow was independently associated with high-CF and long application time while ablation power had no significant relationship.
CONCLUSIONS: With a fixed target AI, TFC-ablation reduced the risk of steam-pops, producing similar lesions in volume, but with different metrics in this ex-vivo study. However, lower CF and higher power in fixed-AI ablation may increase the risk of steam-pops. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Full text links
Trending Papers
2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2023 May 23
How to improve the efficiency and the safety of real-time ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in 2023: a narrative review.Annals of Intensive Care 2023 May 26
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app