We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparing Electrical Stimulation Functional Mapping with Subdural Electrodes and Stereo-EEG.
Epilepsia 2023 March 6
OBJECTIVES: Electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) is the clinical standard for functional localization with subdural electrodes (SDE). As stereo-EEG (SEEG) has emerged as an alternative option, we compared functional responses, after-discharges (ADs) and unwanted ESM-induced seizures (EIS) between the two electrode types.
METHODS: Incidence and current thresholds for functional responses (sensory, motor, speech/language), ADs and EIS were compared between SDE and SEEG using mixed models incorporating relevant covariates.
RESULTS: We identified 67 SEEG ESM and 106 SDE ESM patients (7207 and 4980 stimulated contacts respectively). We found similar incidence of language and motor responses between electrode types, however, more SEEG patients reported sensory responses. ADs and EIS occurred less commonly with SEEG than SDE. Current thresholds for language, face motor, upper extremity (UE) motor, and EIS significantly decreased with age. However, they were not affected by electrode type, premedication, or dominant hemispheric stimulation. AD thresholds were higher with SEEG than with SDE. For SEEG ESM, language thresholds remained below AD thresholds up to 26 years-of-age whereas this relationship was inverse for SDE. Also, face and UE motor thresholds fell below AD thresholds at earlier ages for SEEG than SDE. AD and EIS thresholds were not affected by premedication.
SIGNIFICANCE: SEEG and SDE have clinically relevant differences for functional brain mapping with electrical stimulation. While evaluation of language and motor regions is comparable between SEEG and SDE, SEEG offers higher likelihood of identifying sensory areas. A lower incidence of ADs and EIS, and a favorable relationship between functional and AD thresholds suggest superior safety and neurophysiologic validity for SEEG ESM than SDE ESM.
METHODS: Incidence and current thresholds for functional responses (sensory, motor, speech/language), ADs and EIS were compared between SDE and SEEG using mixed models incorporating relevant covariates.
RESULTS: We identified 67 SEEG ESM and 106 SDE ESM patients (7207 and 4980 stimulated contacts respectively). We found similar incidence of language and motor responses between electrode types, however, more SEEG patients reported sensory responses. ADs and EIS occurred less commonly with SEEG than SDE. Current thresholds for language, face motor, upper extremity (UE) motor, and EIS significantly decreased with age. However, they were not affected by electrode type, premedication, or dominant hemispheric stimulation. AD thresholds were higher with SEEG than with SDE. For SEEG ESM, language thresholds remained below AD thresholds up to 26 years-of-age whereas this relationship was inverse for SDE. Also, face and UE motor thresholds fell below AD thresholds at earlier ages for SEEG than SDE. AD and EIS thresholds were not affected by premedication.
SIGNIFICANCE: SEEG and SDE have clinically relevant differences for functional brain mapping with electrical stimulation. While evaluation of language and motor regions is comparable between SEEG and SDE, SEEG offers higher likelihood of identifying sensory areas. A lower incidence of ADs and EIS, and a favorable relationship between functional and AD thresholds suggest superior safety and neurophysiologic validity for SEEG ESM than SDE ESM.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app