We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL, PHASE II
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Phase 2, placebo-controlled clinical study of oral ganaxolone in PCDH19-clustering epilepsy.
Epilepsy Research 2023 March
INTRODUCTION: Protocadherin-19 (PCDH19)-clustering epilepsy is a distinct developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterized by early-onset seizures that are often treatment refractory. Caused by a mutation of the PCDH19 gene on the X chromosome, this rare epilepsy syndrome primarily affects females with seizure onset commonly in the first year of life. A global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ganaxolone compared with placebo as adjunctive therapy to a standard antiseizure medication regimen in patients with PCDH19-clustering epilepsy (VIOLET; NCT03865732).
METHODS: Females aged 1-17 years with a molecularly confirmed pathogenic or likely pathogenic PCDH19 variant who were experiencing ≥12 seizures during a 12-week screening period were stratified by baseline allopregnanolone sulfate (Allo-S) levels (low: ≤2.5 ng/mL; high: >2.5 ng/mL) at screening and randomized 1:1 within each strata to receive ganaxolone (maximum daily dose of 63 mg/kg/day if ≤28 kg or 1800 mg/day if >28 kg) or matching placebo in addition to their standard antiseizure treatment for the 17-week double-blind phase. The primary efficacy endpoint was the median percentage change in 28-day seizure frequency from baseline to the 17-week double-blind phase. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were tabulated by overall, system organ class, and preferred term.
RESULTS: Of the 29 patients screened, 21 (median age, 7.0 years; IQR, 5.0-10.0 years) were randomized to receive either ganaxolone (n = 10) or placebo (n = 11). After the 17-week double-blind phase, the median (IQR) percentage change in 28-day seizure frequency from baseline was - 61.5% (-95.9% to -33.4%) among patients in the ganaxolone group and - 24.0% (-88.2% to -4.9%) among patients in the placebo group (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p = 0.17). TEAEs were reported by 7 of 10 (70.0%) patients in the ganaxolone group and 11 of 11 (100%) patients in the placebo group. Somnolence was the most common TEAE (40.0% ganaxolone vs 27.3% placebo); serious TEAEs were more common in the placebo group (10.0% ganaxolone vs 45.5% placebo); and 1 (10.0%) patient in the ganaxolone group discontinued the study versus none in the placebo group.
CONCLUSIONS: Ganaxolone was generally well tolerated and led to a greater reduction in the frequency of PCDH19-clustering seizures compared to placebo; however, the trend did not reach statistical significance. Novel trial designs are likely needed to evaluate the effectiveness of antiseizure treatments for PCDH19-clustering epilepsy.
METHODS: Females aged 1-17 years with a molecularly confirmed pathogenic or likely pathogenic PCDH19 variant who were experiencing ≥12 seizures during a 12-week screening period were stratified by baseline allopregnanolone sulfate (Allo-S) levels (low: ≤2.5 ng/mL; high: >2.5 ng/mL) at screening and randomized 1:1 within each strata to receive ganaxolone (maximum daily dose of 63 mg/kg/day if ≤28 kg or 1800 mg/day if >28 kg) or matching placebo in addition to their standard antiseizure treatment for the 17-week double-blind phase. The primary efficacy endpoint was the median percentage change in 28-day seizure frequency from baseline to the 17-week double-blind phase. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were tabulated by overall, system organ class, and preferred term.
RESULTS: Of the 29 patients screened, 21 (median age, 7.0 years; IQR, 5.0-10.0 years) were randomized to receive either ganaxolone (n = 10) or placebo (n = 11). After the 17-week double-blind phase, the median (IQR) percentage change in 28-day seizure frequency from baseline was - 61.5% (-95.9% to -33.4%) among patients in the ganaxolone group and - 24.0% (-88.2% to -4.9%) among patients in the placebo group (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p = 0.17). TEAEs were reported by 7 of 10 (70.0%) patients in the ganaxolone group and 11 of 11 (100%) patients in the placebo group. Somnolence was the most common TEAE (40.0% ganaxolone vs 27.3% placebo); serious TEAEs were more common in the placebo group (10.0% ganaxolone vs 45.5% placebo); and 1 (10.0%) patient in the ganaxolone group discontinued the study versus none in the placebo group.
CONCLUSIONS: Ganaxolone was generally well tolerated and led to a greater reduction in the frequency of PCDH19-clustering seizures compared to placebo; however, the trend did not reach statistical significance. Novel trial designs are likely needed to evaluate the effectiveness of antiseizure treatments for PCDH19-clustering epilepsy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app