We have located links that may give you full text access.
Accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer by combining Proclarix with magnetic resonance imaging.
BJU International 2023 March 2
OBJECTIVES: The use of mpMRI has been a significant advance in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (ISUP Grade Group ≥2, csPCa) and is recommended in most current guidelines. Proclarix® is a novel CE-marked biomarker test aiding in the identification of csPCa. The aim of the study was the assessment of the clinical performance of Proclarix alone or in combination with mpMRI to predict csPCa.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included blood samples from 721 men undergoing mpMRI followed by biopsy at University College London (UCL), London, and Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona. Samples were tested blindly. The Proclarix-MRI model combining prostate volume, Proclarix and mpMRI results was trained using the UCL cohort (n=159) and validated in the Vall d'Hebron cohort (n=562). Its diagnostic performance was established in correlation to biopsy outcome and compared to available clinical parameters and risk calculators.
RESULTS: Clinical performance of the Proclarix-MRI model in the validation cohort did not significantly differ from the training cohort and resulted in a sensitivity for csPCa of 90%, 90% NPV and 66% PPV. The Proclarix-MRI score's specificity (68%) was significantly (p<0.001) better compared to MRI-ERSPC risk score (51%), Proclarix (27%) or mpMRI (28%) alone. In addition, Proclarix by itself was found to be useful in the MRI PI-RADS 3 subgroup by outperforming PSA density in terms of specificity (25% vs 13%, p=0.004) at 100% sensitivity.
CONCLUSION: When combined with mpMRI and prostate volume, Proclarix reliably predicted csPCa and ruled out men with no or indolent cancer. A large reduction of two thirds of unneeded biopsies was achieved. Proclarix can further be used with high confidence to reliably detect csPCa in men with an indeterminate PI-RADS 3 mpMRI. Despite these encouraging results, further validation is needed.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included blood samples from 721 men undergoing mpMRI followed by biopsy at University College London (UCL), London, and Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona. Samples were tested blindly. The Proclarix-MRI model combining prostate volume, Proclarix and mpMRI results was trained using the UCL cohort (n=159) and validated in the Vall d'Hebron cohort (n=562). Its diagnostic performance was established in correlation to biopsy outcome and compared to available clinical parameters and risk calculators.
RESULTS: Clinical performance of the Proclarix-MRI model in the validation cohort did not significantly differ from the training cohort and resulted in a sensitivity for csPCa of 90%, 90% NPV and 66% PPV. The Proclarix-MRI score's specificity (68%) was significantly (p<0.001) better compared to MRI-ERSPC risk score (51%), Proclarix (27%) or mpMRI (28%) alone. In addition, Proclarix by itself was found to be useful in the MRI PI-RADS 3 subgroup by outperforming PSA density in terms of specificity (25% vs 13%, p=0.004) at 100% sensitivity.
CONCLUSION: When combined with mpMRI and prostate volume, Proclarix reliably predicted csPCa and ruled out men with no or indolent cancer. A large reduction of two thirds of unneeded biopsies was achieved. Proclarix can further be used with high confidence to reliably detect csPCa in men with an indeterminate PI-RADS 3 mpMRI. Despite these encouraging results, further validation is needed.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app