Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Japanese subgroup analysis of GLIMMER: A global Phase 2b study of linerixibat for the treatment of cholestatic pruritus in patients with primary biliary cholangitis.

AIM: To compare patient characteristics and outcomes between the overall and Japanese populations of GLIMMER.

METHODS: GLIMMER was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 2b study evaluating linerixibat for the treatment of pruritus in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were randomized in the GLIMMER overall population with 38 patients comprising the Japanese population. Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics were similar across treatment groups and between both populations. A reduction in mean worst daily itch score from baseline to Week 16 (primary endpoint) was seen in all groups, with the largest reduction observed with linerixibat 40 mg twice daily (BID; -2.92 [95% CI: -5.07, -0.76] and -2.86 [95% CI: -3.76, -1.95] for Japanese and overall populations, respectively). The highest proportion of responders was generally in the 40 mg BID group in both populations regardless of the responder definition applied. Improvements in health-related quality of life were generally consistent in both populations. In the Japanese and overall populations, on-treatment drug-related adverse events were reported in 25% and 19% of patients in the placebo group and 0-86% and 31-78% of patients in the linerixibat groups, respectively. Consistent with the mechanism of action, the most common events were gastrointestinal in nature. Effects of linerixibat on pharmacodynamic biomarkers favored BID dosing.

CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic responses and safety of linerixibat were consistent between the Japanese and overall populations of GLIMMER. Linerixibat may provide an effective treatment option for cholestatic pruritus in patients with PBC. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app