We have located links that may give you full text access.
Use of a biological scaffold in the cleavage area in complex revision breast augmentation: A surgical technique and case series.
BACKGROUND: Bilateral breast augmentation has been the top surgical procedure performed worldwide by plastic surgeons for the past 5 years. Complex breast revision patients are challenging, with the cleavage area being one of the most difficult areas to navigate. We present a novel technique for using biological scaffolds in revision breast augmentation surgery.
METHODS: A step-by-step surgical technique is presented, combined with a series of 11 cases where either SurgiMend® acellular dermal matrix (ADM) or GalaFLEX mesh was used specifically in the medial cleavage area to correct a difficult to manage soft tissue contour deformity.
RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent revision breast augmentation with the use of the biological scaffolds in the medial cleavage area. The mean age was 43 years with a range of 29-68 years. All replacement breast implants were anatomical-shaped, medium profile, polyurethane-coated implants. GalaFLEX® mesh was used in six patients; five patients received SurgiMend® ADM. Mastopexy was performed in 8/11 patients. There were two complications in the same patient in this series, one emergency return to theater for bleeding and one minor scar revision.
CONCLUSIONS: Revision breast augmentation surgery includes a smorgasbord of options that can be used individually or in combination, such as full or partial capsulectomy, removal alone or replacement of the implant, change to the tissue plane of where the implant sits, mastopexy, and fat transfer. In addition to these recognized treatments, we would like to advocate the option of a biological scaffold for extra support of the cleavage area in complex revision cases.
METHODS: A step-by-step surgical technique is presented, combined with a series of 11 cases where either SurgiMend® acellular dermal matrix (ADM) or GalaFLEX mesh was used specifically in the medial cleavage area to correct a difficult to manage soft tissue contour deformity.
RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent revision breast augmentation with the use of the biological scaffolds in the medial cleavage area. The mean age was 43 years with a range of 29-68 years. All replacement breast implants were anatomical-shaped, medium profile, polyurethane-coated implants. GalaFLEX® mesh was used in six patients; five patients received SurgiMend® ADM. Mastopexy was performed in 8/11 patients. There were two complications in the same patient in this series, one emergency return to theater for bleeding and one minor scar revision.
CONCLUSIONS: Revision breast augmentation surgery includes a smorgasbord of options that can be used individually or in combination, such as full or partial capsulectomy, removal alone or replacement of the implant, change to the tissue plane of where the implant sits, mastopexy, and fat transfer. In addition to these recognized treatments, we would like to advocate the option of a biological scaffold for extra support of the cleavage area in complex revision cases.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app