We have located links that may give you full text access.
Rural, Large Town, and Urban Differences in Optimal Subspecialty Follow-up and Survivorship Care Plan Documentation among Childhood Cancer Survivors.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2023 Februrary 25
BACKGROUND: Children with cancer from rural and non-urban areas face unique challenges. Health equity for this population requires attention to geographic disparities in optimal survivorship-focused care.
METHODS: The Oklahoma Childhood Cancer Survivor Cohort was based on all patients reported to the institutional cancer registry and <18-years-old at diagnosis between January 1, 2005, and September 24, 2014. Suboptimal follow-up was defined as no completed oncology-related clinic visit five to seven years after their initial diagnosis (survivors were 7-25 years old at end of the follow-up period). The primary predictor of interest was rurality.
RESULTS: Ninety-four (21%) of the 449 eligible survivors received suboptimal follow-up. There were significant differences (p=0.01) as 36% of survivors from large towns (n=28/78) compared with 21% (n=20/95) and 17% (n=46/276) of survivors from small town/isolated rural and urban areas received suboptimal follow-up, respectively. Forty-five percent of adolescents at diagnosis were not seen in the clinic compared with 17% of non-adolescents (p<0.01). An adjusted risk ratio of 2.2 (95% CI 1.5, 3.2) was observed for suboptimal follow-up among survivors from large towns, compared with survivors from urban areas. Seventy-three percent of survivors (n=271/369) had a documented survivorship care plan with similar trends by rurality.
CONCLUSIONS: Survivors from large towns and those who were adolescents at the time of diagnosis were more likely to receive suboptimal follow-up care compared to survivors from urban areas and those diagnosed younger than thirteen.
IMPACT: Observed geographic disparities in survivorship care will inform interventions to promote equitable care for survivors from non-urban areas.
METHODS: The Oklahoma Childhood Cancer Survivor Cohort was based on all patients reported to the institutional cancer registry and <18-years-old at diagnosis between January 1, 2005, and September 24, 2014. Suboptimal follow-up was defined as no completed oncology-related clinic visit five to seven years after their initial diagnosis (survivors were 7-25 years old at end of the follow-up period). The primary predictor of interest was rurality.
RESULTS: Ninety-four (21%) of the 449 eligible survivors received suboptimal follow-up. There were significant differences (p=0.01) as 36% of survivors from large towns (n=28/78) compared with 21% (n=20/95) and 17% (n=46/276) of survivors from small town/isolated rural and urban areas received suboptimal follow-up, respectively. Forty-five percent of adolescents at diagnosis were not seen in the clinic compared with 17% of non-adolescents (p<0.01). An adjusted risk ratio of 2.2 (95% CI 1.5, 3.2) was observed for suboptimal follow-up among survivors from large towns, compared with survivors from urban areas. Seventy-three percent of survivors (n=271/369) had a documented survivorship care plan with similar trends by rurality.
CONCLUSIONS: Survivors from large towns and those who were adolescents at the time of diagnosis were more likely to receive suboptimal follow-up care compared to survivors from urban areas and those diagnosed younger than thirteen.
IMPACT: Observed geographic disparities in survivorship care will inform interventions to promote equitable care for survivors from non-urban areas.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app