Influence of geospatial resolution on sociodemographic predictors of COVID-19 in Massachusetts.

PURPOSE: When studying health risks across a large geographic region such as a state or province, researchers often assume that finer resolution data on health outcomes and risk factors will improve inferences by avoiding ecological bias and other issues associated with geographic aggregation. However, coarser resolution data (e.g., at the town or county level) are more commonly publicly available and packaged for easier access, allowing for rapid analyses. The advantages and limitations of using finer resolution data, which may improve precision at the cost of time spent gaining access and processing data, have not been considered in detail to date.

METHODS: We systematically examine the implications of conducting town-level mixed-effect regression analyses versus census tract-level analyses to study sociodemographic predictors of COVID-19 in Massachusetts. In a series of negative binomial regressions, we vary the spatial resolution of the outcome, the resolution of variable selection, and the resolution of the random effect to allow for more direct comparison across models.

RESULTS: We find stability in some estimates across scenarios, changes in magnitude, direction, and significance in others, and tighter confidence intervals on the census-tract level. Conclusions regarding sociodemographic predictors are robust when regions of high concentration remain consistent across town and census-tract resolutions.

CONCLUSIONS: Inferences about high-risk populations may be misleading if derived from town- or county-resolution data, especially for covariates that capture small subgroups (e.g. small racial minority populations) or are geographically concentrated or skewed (e.g. % college students). Our analysis can help inform more rapid and efficient use of public health data by identifying when finer-resolution data is truly most informative, or when coarser-resolution data may be misleading.