Epoxy allergy, investigation of a modern industry.
Contact Dermatitis 2023 Februrary 18
BACKGROUND: Five workers from an industry manufacturing various articles from carbon fibre reinforced epoxy plastics were referred to our department because of suspected occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD). When patch tested 4 of them had positive reactions to components of epoxy resin systems that could explain their current skin problems. All of them had been working at the same workstation at a specially designed pressing machine, with operations including manually mixing epoxy resin with hardener. Multiple cases of OACD in the plant prompted an investigation including all workers with possible risk exposures at the plant.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of occupational dermatoses and contact allergies among the workers at the plant.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally 25 workers underwent investigation that included a brief consultation with a standardized anamnesis and clinical examination followed by patch testing.
RESULTS: ERSs-related reactions were found in 7 of the 25 investigated workers. None of the 7 had a history of previous exposure to ERSs and they are regarded as sensitized through work.
CONCLUSIONS: 28 % of investigated workers showed reactions to ERSs. Of these the majority would have been missed if supplementary testing would not have been added to testing with the Swedish base line series. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of occupational dermatoses and contact allergies among the workers at the plant.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally 25 workers underwent investigation that included a brief consultation with a standardized anamnesis and clinical examination followed by patch testing.
RESULTS: ERSs-related reactions were found in 7 of the 25 investigated workers. None of the 7 had a history of previous exposure to ERSs and they are regarded as sensitized through work.
CONCLUSIONS: 28 % of investigated workers showed reactions to ERSs. Of these the majority would have been missed if supplementary testing would not have been added to testing with the Swedish base line series. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app